Discussions and Questions The - Page 95
Will the Royal Enfield Roadster 350 be able to bring in the young riders to the company?
13 January 2025 07:01
Young riders are interested in fuel efficiency and easy maneuverability in city. If the Roadster does as it promises, age will be irrelevant.
Is the Royal Enfield Roadster 350 just another Classic 350 in another guise?
13 January 2025 07:01
No, it isn't just a Classic 350 in disguise. The riding position of the Roadster, and hence its ergonomics, is more upright than the LC 18. It’s like comparing apples and slightly different apples.
Will the Royal Enfield Roadster 350 eat into sales of Classic 350 and Hunter 350?
13 January 2025 07:01
Sure, it might eat a little bit into Classic 350 sales, but that’s not necessarily a bad thing. In the 350cc segment, RE is just covering all their bases.
Can the Royal Enfield Roadster 350 stand up to Japanese rivals in the same segment?
13 January 2025 07:01
I have owned RE and Japanese bikes and I think the Roadster has a good chance. That’s got character, and that’s what buyers in this segment want.
Exclusively: How does the Meteor 350 fare by way of comfort on long rides vs others in the class?
13 January 2025 06:57
Being someone who has ridden the Meteor and the Honda H'ness CB350, I’d say the Meteor is more comfortable for long rides. The suspension is softer, this is great when driving on bumpy roads. But, at higher speeds the H'ness feels more stable. Really, it depends on your riding style and the type of roads you will be on.
Is the Meteor 350's retro looks too impractical for everyday use?
13 January 2025 06:57
I love the look, but it has to be said that it does compromise some practicality. For daily use, it can be annoying that there are no modern features such as a USB port or a comprehensive digital display. Additionally, the classic round headlight isn’t as effective as some modern LED setups you’ll find on the latest eMTBs for night riding.
So, how does the Meteor 350 fare when compared to more modern 350-400cc bikes?
13 January 2025 06:57
The Meteor’s handling is good for what it is, but it does seem a tad old school compared to bikes like Honda’s CB350 or even Royal Enfield’s own Classic 350. At higher speeds, the vibrations can be annoying and it has a bit of trouble on steep inclines. But it’s got character that a lot of modern bikes don’t have.
Has the Royal Enfield Meteor 350 lived up to all the hype, or is it all just clever marketing?
13 January 2025 06:57
But I'd say the Meteor deserves most of the hype. It's not aiming to be the fastest or most advanced bike, it’s about giving a certain riding experience and it does this really well. It's smooth engine, comfortable ride and classic looks all mixed together to be more than the sum of its parts. Plus, the price is something that most riders can afford.
Is the Royal Enfield Meteor 350 actually a good first bike for beginners?
13 January 2025 06:57
I can say that as a Meteor 350 owner, it is a very good first bike. It's easy to ride in city traffic with the low end torque and the build quality gives you confidence. But there’s not much here in the way of modern features that a beginner might find useful, like a gear indicator.
Did KTM price themselves out of the market with the 790 Adventure, or is it worth the premium over Japanese rivals?
13 January 2025 06:56
If you are mostly on the road, it is not worth it. Japanese alternatives are better value for money.
Is the KTM 790 Adventure's fuel tank a game changer or a gimmick?
13 January 2025 06:56
It's not just hype. While they are noticeably easier to maneuver in tight spots, Arduinos can be very cumbersome and cumbersome to work with.
How does the KTM 790 Adventure fare two-up and on long-distance trips?
13 January 2025 06:56
It’s a touring beast, with the right luggage setup. Used to cross Europe two up, no problem.
Can the KTM 790 Adventure be relied upon for long-distance touring?
13 January 2025 06:56
2 years with no major problems, but there are small ones far more often than on my Japanese bikes.
What’s the difference between the 2023 KTM 790 Adventure and the original Austrian made version?
13 January 2025 06:56
The character of the engine is the same. You wouldn't know that it's made some place else if you didn't know.
Tell us about the most memorable experience you’ve had (or heard about) with a Royal Enfield Machismo 500.
13 January 2025 06:52
Charity ride, used my Machismo. We raised more money than we expected because of how much attention the thumping sound drew. Everywhere we stopped, it was a conversation starter.
Is the Machismo 500 still relevant in today’s motorcycle market?
13 January 2025 06:52
That depends from what you want. If you can deal with some maintenance and want a vintage feel the Machismo is great. Newer bikes are better for commuting, however.
What is the biggest misconception surrounding owning a Royal Enfield Machismo 500?
13 January 2025 06:52
The idea that you need to be a mechanic to own one is way off. It's not rocket science to maintain basic maintenance and most problems are easy fixes.
Was the Machismo 350 actually any better than the other bikes, or was it just all a bunch of marketing?
13 January 2025 06:40
I’m a mechanic, and I can tell you the changes were more than cosmetic. It does tweak the frame and suspension which does improve handling. It's not revolutionary but it's there.
Is the Machismo 350 cult following justified, or just nostalgia fuelled?
13 January 2025 06:40
It’s not about the specs of the bike, it’s about the cult following of the overall experience. There’s something to the Machismo that modern bikes lack, and it’s something worth celebrating.
Is the Royal Enfield Machismo 350 really the best handling Bullet that Royal Enfield ever made?
13 January 2025 06:40
Absolutely! I've ridden the Machismo and standard Bullets and the Machismo feels much more nimble. It makes a huge difference in tight turns because of its lighter weight.
Ask a Question