The choice between the Honda CB350RS and the Royal Enfield Continental GT 650 depends on several factors, including your riding style, preferences, and needs. Here are some key differences to consider: - **Engine and Performance**: The Royal Enfield Continental GT 650 is powered by a 648cc air-cooled, parallel-twin engine producing 47 PS @ 7150 rpm and 52 Nm @ 5250 rpm, which is significantly more powerful than the Honda CB350RS's 348.36 cc single-cylinder engine producing 21.07 PS @ 5500 rpm and 30 Nm @ 3000 rpm. - **Mileage and Range**: The Honda CB350RS has a claimed mileage of 35 kmpl, while the Royal Enfield Continental GT 650 typically offers around 25-30 kmpl. The CB350RS has a 15-liter fuel tank, similar to the Continental GT 650, but the better mileage of the CB350RS might give it a slightly longer range. - **Handling and Ergonomics**: The Honda CB350RS is known for its sportier riding posture with a wide handlebar and slightly rearset footpegs, while the Royal Enfield Continental GT 650 has a more upright riding position. The CB350RS also features a more comfortable and spacious seat. - **Braking and Safety**: Both bikes come with dual-channel ABS, but the Royal Enfield Continental GT 650 has larger brake discs compared to the CB350RS . - **Price**: The Honda CB350RS is priced between ?2.15 lakh to ?2.18 lakh, whereas the Royal Enfield Continental GT 650 is significantly more expensive, starting at around ?3.28 lakh. If you prioritize raw power and a more traditional cafe-racer experience, the Royal Enfield Continental GT 650 might be the better choice. However, if you are looking for a more affordable, fuel-efficient bike with a sportier riding posture and modern features, the Honda CB350RS could be the better option.

The choice between the Royal Enfield Continental GT 650 and the Royal Enfield Interceptor 650 largely depends on your riding style and preferences. Here are some key differences to consider:

The Continental GT 650 is a cafe racer, designed for a more aggressive, sporty riding position with rearset footrests and clip-on bars, making it ideal for those who enjoy a tucked-in, aerodynamic stance. It features 36-spoke aluminium alloy rims with Ceat Zoomcruz tyres, a ground clearance of 174 mm, and a lean angle that makes it versatile for both city streets and twisty roads. The bike has a seat height of 31.1 inches and a kerb weight of 202 kg, with a fuel capacity of 13.7 litres. On the other hand, the Interceptor 650 is a classic roadster with a more relaxed riding position, featuring a tear-drop fuel tank, tall and wide handlebars, and an 18-inch front and rear spoke wheel setup with Pirelli Phantom Sportscomp tyres. It has a slightly taller seat height at 31.5 inches and a kerb weight of 445 pounds , along with a fuel capacity of 3.6 gallons. The Interceptor is known for its comfortable ride and is more suited for long-distance touring and everyday commuting. In terms of performance, both bikes share the same 648cc air-cooled, parallel-twin engine, producing 47 horsepower at 7150 RPM and 52 Nm of torque at 5250 RPM, along with a 6-speed transmission and Bosch dual-channel ABS. However, the Continental GT 650's ergonomics and suspension setup are tuned more for sporty handling, while the Interceptor 650 offers a more balanced and comfortable ride. Ultimately, if you prefer a sporty, aggressive riding stance and the thrill of carving through twisty roads, the Continental GT 650 might be the better option. If you are looking for a more comfortable, versatile bike for daily commuting and long-distance touring, the Interceptor 650 would be more suitable.