Discussions and Questions Bajaj Pulsar - Page 20
How does the NS160 fare as a long-term ownership proposition?
30 January 2025 09:53
Long-term comfort is surprisingly good. Even after owning it for years, long rides aren't a pain.
How does the NS160 hold up for taller riders?
30 January 2025 09:53
As a 6'2" rider, I find the NS160 surprisingly comfortable. The slightly higher seat height really helps.
How does the NS160 hold up for taller riders?
30 January 2025 09:53
It's okay for short rides, but on longer trips, I (6'0") start feeling cramped after an hour or so. Wish the footpegs were a bit more rear-set.
How does the NS160 hold up for taller riders?
30 January 2025 09:53
I'm 5'11" and it fits me perfectly. I think it's ideal for average to slightly above average height riders.
How does the NS160 hold up for taller riders?
30 January 2025 09:53
Tall riders might want to look elsewhere. My 6'3" friend tried it and looked like a giant on a kid's bike.
How does the NS160 hold up for taller riders?
30 January 2025 09:53
It's not bad, but not great either for tall riders. I'm 6'1" and had to modify the handlebar position to feel comfortable.
How does the NS160 hold up for taller riders?
30 January 2025 09:53
As a 5'9" rider, it feels just right. I think Bajaj designed it with the average Indian height in mind.
How does the NS160 hold up for taller riders?
30 January 2025 09:53
Taller riders can manage, but you might want to invest in some aftermarket parts like raised handlebars for better comfort.
Does the NS160 live up to Bajaj's "Fastest Indian" legacy?
30 January 2025 09:53
It's quick for a 160cc, but calling it the "Fastest Indian" is a stretch. It's more like "The Slightly Quicker Than Average Indian."
Does the NS160 live up to Bajaj's "Fastest Indian" legacy?
30 January 2025 09:53
For its segment, it's pretty fast. You can't expect 220cc performance from a 160cc engine, but it holds its own against competitors.
Does the NS160 live up to Bajaj's "Fastest Indian" legacy?
30 January 2025 09:53
The NS160 is more about handling than straight-line speed. It might not be the fastest, but it's definitely one of the most fun to ride in its class.
Does the NS160 live up to Bajaj's "Fastest Indian" legacy?
30 January 2025 09:53
Bajaj's marketing is overselling it. It's a good bike, but it doesn't live up to the hype of being exceptionally fast.
Does the NS160 live up to Bajaj's "Fastest Indian" legacy?
30 January 2025 09:53
In city traffic, it feels plenty fast. But on open roads, you start wishing for more power. It's fast-ish, not fastest.
Does the NS160 live up to Bajaj's "Fastest Indian" legacy?
30 January 2025 09:53
The "Fastest Indian" legacy is more about the spirit than actual speed. In that sense, the NS160 delivers with its sporty feel and quick response.
Does the NS160 live up to Bajaj's "Fastest Indian" legacy?
30 January 2025 09:53
Let's be real, no 160cc bike is going to be the "Fastest Indian." But for what it is, the NS160 is pretty nippy.
Is the Pulsar NS160 really worth the hype?
30 January 2025 09:53
Absolutely worth it! The NS160 handles like a dream compared to other 160cc bikes. That perimeter frame makes a real difference in cornering.
Is the Pulsar NS160 really worth the hype?
30 January 2025 09:53
Overhyped, if you ask me. Sure, it looks cool, but performance-wise, it's not that different from the Apache RTR 160 4V, which is cheaper.
Is the Pulsar NS160 really worth the hype?
30 January 2025 09:53
It's a mixed bag. Great for city riding, but on highways, it feels a bit underpowered. I wish Bajaj had given it a bit more oomph.
Is the Pulsar NS160 really worth the hype?
30 January 2025 09:53
The hype is justified if you're into sporty looks and handling. But for pure commuting, there are cheaper options that do the job just as well.
Is the Pulsar NS160 really worth the hype?
30 January 2025 09:53
I'd say it's worth it for the build quality alone. This thing feels solid compared to some of the flimsier 160cc bikes out there.
Ask a Question