Discussions and Questions Bajaj Pulsar - Page 22
How does the NS160 fare as a long-term ownership proposition?
30 January 2025 09:53
I've had mine for 3 years now, and it's been rock solid. Regular maintenance is key, but it hasn't given me any major headaches.
How does the NS160 fare as a long-term ownership proposition?
30 January 2025 09:53
The first year was great, but after that, small issues started cropping up. Nothing major, but more frequent than I'd like.
How does the NS160 fare as a long-term ownership proposition?
30 January 2025 09:53
Long-term, it's been good value for money. Fuel efficiency is still great, and parts are easily available.
How does the NS160 fare as a long-term ownership proposition?
30 January 2025 09:53
I've found the maintenance costs a bit higher than expected. The oil-cooled engine seems to need more attention.
How does the NS160 fare as a long-term ownership proposition?
30 January 2025 09:53
It ages well aesthetically, but performance-wise, you start feeling the need for more power after a couple of years.
How does the NS160 fare as a long-term ownership proposition?
30 January 2025 09:53
As a daily commuter, it's held up brilliantly. No major issues in 4 years, and it still feels fresh to ride.
How does the NS160 fare as a long-term ownership proposition?
30 January 2025 09:53
The resale value is decent, but not as good as some Japanese bikes. Something to consider if you plan to upgrade in a few years.
How does the NS160 fare as a long-term ownership proposition?
30 January 2025 09:53
Long-term comfort is surprisingly good. Even after owning it for years, long rides aren't a pain.
How does the NS160 hold up for taller riders?
30 January 2025 09:53
As a 6'2" rider, I find the NS160 surprisingly comfortable. The slightly higher seat height really helps.
How does the NS160 hold up for taller riders?
30 January 2025 09:53
It's okay for short rides, but on longer trips, I (6'0") start feeling cramped after an hour or so. Wish the footpegs were a bit more rear-set.
How does the NS160 hold up for taller riders?
30 January 2025 09:53
I'm 5'11" and it fits me perfectly. I think it's ideal for average to slightly above average height riders.
How does the NS160 hold up for taller riders?
30 January 2025 09:53
Tall riders might want to look elsewhere. My 6'3" friend tried it and looked like a giant on a kid's bike.
How does the NS160 hold up for taller riders?
30 January 2025 09:53
It's not bad, but not great either for tall riders. I'm 6'1" and had to modify the handlebar position to feel comfortable.
How does the NS160 hold up for taller riders?
30 January 2025 09:53
As a 5'9" rider, it feels just right. I think Bajaj designed it with the average Indian height in mind.
How does the NS160 hold up for taller riders?
30 January 2025 09:53
Taller riders can manage, but you might want to invest in some aftermarket parts like raised handlebars for better comfort.
Does the NS160 live up to Bajaj's "Fastest Indian" legacy?
30 January 2025 09:53
It's quick for a 160cc, but calling it the "Fastest Indian" is a stretch. It's more like "The Slightly Quicker Than Average Indian."
Does the NS160 live up to Bajaj's "Fastest Indian" legacy?
30 January 2025 09:53
For its segment, it's pretty fast. You can't expect 220cc performance from a 160cc engine, but it holds its own against competitors.
Does the NS160 live up to Bajaj's "Fastest Indian" legacy?
30 January 2025 09:53
The NS160 is more about handling than straight-line speed. It might not be the fastest, but it's definitely one of the most fun to ride in its class.
Does the NS160 live up to Bajaj's "Fastest Indian" legacy?
30 January 2025 09:53
Bajaj's marketing is overselling it. It's a good bike, but it doesn't live up to the hype of being exceptionally fast.
Does the NS160 live up to Bajaj's "Fastest Indian" legacy?
30 January 2025 09:53
In city traffic, it feels plenty fast. But on open roads, you start wishing for more power. It's fast-ish, not fastest.
Ask a Question