Discussions and Questions - Bajaj Bajaj - Page 30
Can the Pulsar N160 tackle long distance touring?
30 January 2025 09:19
I made a 500km trip on the N160, and it did surprisingly well. The engine doesn't seem to be worked hard at highway speeds, and the seat is comfortable enough. While it’s no tourer, it’s easily capable of weekend trips.
Can the Pulsar N160 tackle long distance touring?
30 January 2025 09:19
Are you kidding? The N160 is just too small for proper touring. With a tiny fuel tank, you’re stopping all the time; and with no wind protection, long ride are a pain. This one’s for short trips only.
Can the Pulsar N160 tackle long distance touring?
30 January 2025 09:19
It's all about expectations I think. The N160 is a great budget touring guitar. It's efficient, it’s reliable, and it’s comfortable enough. It won't compete with the bigger bikes built for touring, but don't expect it to.
Can the Pulsar N160 tackle long distance touring?
30 January 2025 09:19
You're forgetting about modifications. The N160 could be a decent light tourer with a bigger windscreen, some soft luggage and a comfier seat. And it works well, I've done it.
Can the Pulsar N160 tackle long distance touring?
30 January 2025 09:19
If you are used to smaller bikes, the N160 is fine for touring. If you have ridden larger machines you will find it wanting. It’s all how you look at things and what you are used to.
Can the Pulsar N160 tackle long distance touring?
30 January 2025 09:19
Touring on a 160cc bike will always be a compromise, let’s be real. The N160 does it better than most in its class, however. Overall the engine is smooth and the ergonomics are decent, 'making it bearable for longer rides.'
Can the Pulsar N160 tackle long distance touring?
30 January 2025 09:19
I think people don’t realize how good small bikes are for touring. On twisty roads, the N160 is light, nimble and easy to handle. In fact, it’s ideal for exploring backroads and small towns.
Is the Pulsar N160 the safest bike in its segment as Bajaj claims?
30 January 2025 09:19
I believe Bajaj is right. This makes dual channel ABS a game changer in this segment. It's saved my ass a couple of times already. It’s also quite stable overall.
Is the Pulsar N160 the safest bike in its segment as Bajaj claims?
30 January 2025 09:19
It’s not the safest because of ABS alone. I’d argue that the Apache RTR 160 4V has better handling and brakes, which are more important for everyday safety. ABS on the N160 is great, but that’s not all there is.
Is the Pulsar N160 the safest bike in its segment as Bajaj claims?
30 January 2025 09:19
You're both missing the point. It’s more about the rider than the bike. The N160 does everything very nicely, but if you behave like an idiot, no amount of ABS will save you.
Is the Pulsar N160 the safest bike in its segment as Bajaj claims?
30 January 2025 09:19
I can say that the N160's safety features are legit because I've crashed with and without ABS. However, Bajaj needs to spend the effort educating riders on how to use these features.
Is the Pulsar N160 the safest bike in its segment as Bajaj claims?
30 January 2025 09:19
The truth is, the safest bike is the one you’re most comfortable riding. To some, that may be the N160. It could be a different bike for others. It's subjective.
Is the Pulsar N160 the safest bike in its segment as Bajaj claims?
30 January 2025 09:19
I believe there is more marketing than reality to the N160's safety claim. It has good features, but safety isn’t the only factor. Build quality and long term reliability also play a role. These we need more time to judge.
Is the Pulsar N160 the safest bike in its segment as Bajaj claims?
30 January 2025 09:19
However, I wish Bajaj had included traction control as well, because the dualchannel ABS is great. It would have really made it the safest in the segment. Right now, it's safe, but it's not revolutionary.
In real world riding, how does the Pulsar N160’s engine compare to the NS160?
30 January 2025 09:19
I've been on both and the N160's engine is definitely more refined. At higher RPMs it is smoother and doesn’t vibrate as much as the NS160. Compared with the N160, the N160 is definitely more comfortable for daily commuting.
In real world riding, how does the Pulsar N160’s engine compare to the NS160?
30 January 2025 09:19
Disagree. The engine might be older in the NS160 but it’s more fun. In the low end it’s peppier and is great for jumping in traffic. The N160, however, feels a bit dull in comparison.
In real world riding, how does the Pulsar N160’s engine compare to the NS160?
30 January 2025 09:19
You're both missing the point. The engine of the N160 is better for touring. At highway speeds it is more relaxed and doesn't heat up as much in stop and go traffic. It’s the clear winner for long rides.
In real world riding, how does the Pulsar N160’s engine compare to the NS160?
30 January 2025 09:19
The NS160's engine is what I like best as a mechanic. It's easier and it's simpler to work on. Most riders don’t need the added complexity of the N160’s oil cooling system.
In real world riding, how does the Pulsar N160’s engine compare to the NS160?
30 January 2025 09:19
Truthfully, for most riders the difference is negligible. Both engines are good. Though the N160 might be a bit more refined, the NS160 has proven itself. It’s a matter of personal preference.
In real world riding, how does the Pulsar N160’s engine compare to the NS160?
30 January 2025 09:19
I think the N160’s engine is overrated. Yeah, it's smoother, but it's not character. Overall, the NS160 feels more like a proper Pulsar – it’s gruntier and more engaging to ride.
Ask a Question