Discussions and Questions Royal Enfield Himalayan 450

Which KTM 390 Adventure SW is better for long-distance touring than the Royal Enfield Himalayan 450?
15 January 2025 06:56
Hands down, the KTM is better for touring. It’s faster, more comfortable on highways, and the electronics make for safer long rides.
Which KTM 390 Adventure SW is better for long-distance touring than the Royal Enfield Himalayan 450?
15 January 2025 06:56
For long-distance touring, I’d pick the Himalayan any day. It is more relaxed, offers better wind protection, and, over long hours in the saddle, is less fatiguing.
Which KTM 390 Adventure SW is better for long-distance touring than the Royal Enfield Himalayan 450?
15 January 2025 06:56
The 390 Adventure SW is great, but for true touring, the Himalayan’s more upright position and softer suspension win for me.
Which KTM 390 Adventure SW is better for long-distance touring than the Royal Enfield Himalayan 450?
15 January 2025 06:56
That really depends on what kind of touring you do. But if you’re mostly on paved roads and like to ride fast, the KTM is better. If you’re more into mixed terrain and a more laid-back pace, then go with the Himalayan.
Which KTM 390 Adventure SW is better for long-distance touring than the Royal Enfield Himalayan 450?
15 January 2025 06:56
I've done long trips on both, and I like the KTM better. With the adjustable suspension, you can adjust the perfect setup for various loads and road conditions.
Which KTM 390 Adventure SW is better for long-distance touring than the Royal Enfield Himalayan 450?
15 January 2025 06:56
Especially with luggage, the Himalayan feels planted and stable. I use this as my serious touring adventure go-to.
Which KTM 390 Adventure SW is better for long-distance touring than the Royal Enfield Himalayan 450?
15 January 2025 06:56
KTM all the way for me. The ride modes and quick shifter make long-distance riding so much more enjoyable and less tiring.
Which KTM 390 Adventure SW is better for long-distance touring than the Royal Enfield Himalayan 450?
15 January 2025 06:56
I owned both, and I would say that the Himalayan is a better touring option in India. It's easier to fix in remote areas and also does better on rough roads.
As long-distance tourers, what sets the KTM 390 Adventure apart from the Royal Enfield Himalayan 450?
13 January 2025 06:40
Well, the KTM is definitely better for all this mixed touring with lots of twisty roads. Its engine is more powerful, and its handling is a sporty affair on pavement.
As long-distance tourers, what sets the KTM 390 Adventure apart from the Royal Enfield Himalayan 450?
13 January 2025 06:40
If looking for pure long-distance comfort, I'd go for the Himalayan. After hours in the saddle, the upright seating position and good wind protection are a big deal.
As long-distance tourers, what sets the KTM 390 Adventure apart from the Royal Enfield Himalayan 450?
13 January 2025 06:40
Better fuel efficiency of the 390 Adventure puts it on a higher edge for touring. Of course, on long trips, you can go further between fill-ups.
As long-distance tourers, what sets the KTM 390 Adventure apart from the Royal Enfield Himalayan 450?
13 January 2025 06:40
All the way Himalayan for touring. Low-end torque is great for loaded riding, and it's easier to work on if something goes wrong in the middle of nowhere.
As long-distance tourers, what sets the KTM 390 Adventure apart from the Royal Enfield Himalayan 450?
13 January 2025 06:40
I've set up camp on both, and honestly, after touring on them both, I have more confidence in the KTM's more advanced electronics (like traction control and cornering ABS), especially in bad weather.
As long-distance tourers, what sets the KTM 390 Adventure apart from the Royal Enfield Himalayan 450?
13 January 2025 06:40
Simplicity is the Himalayan 450's strength for touring. Easier to fix if it goes wrong, and less to go wrong. And that engine is butter smooth at highway speed.
As long-distance tourers, what sets the KTM 390 Adventure apart from the Royal Enfield Himalayan 450?
13 January 2025 06:40
Plus, KTM’s dealer network is better in many countries—something that could make a big difference in case you break down on a long tour and need parts and service.
As long-distance tourers, what sets the KTM 390 Adventure apart from the Royal Enfield Himalayan 450?
13 January 2025 06:40
The lighter weight of the 390 Adventure means it’s easier to handle for the fully loaded touring version when you’re on narrow mountain roads.
As long-distance tourers, what sets the KTM 390 Adventure apart from the Royal Enfield Himalayan 450?
13 January 2025 06:40
For touring, the Himalayan is the bike I prefer. The leisurely pace is a bit more enjoyable. It’s not always about getting there the fastest.
Can the Himalayan 450’s extra weight cancel out its advantage in power for off road?
09 January 2025 10:50
Off road the extra weight is definitely noticeable, especially in tight technical sections. Yes, the power is great on open trails, but trying to muscle the bike through a rocky section, those extra kilos really count. I think RE gave up some off road agility for on road performance.
Can the Himalayan 450’s extra weight cancel out its advantage in power for off road?
09 January 2025 10:50
I have been on both and the power difference of the 450 more than makes up for the weight it adds. It climbs hills much easier and pulls through sand like a champ. It's a bit heavier to pick up but the improved suspension helps keep the bike more planted so less likely to drop it in the first place.
Can the Himalayan 450’s extra weight cancel out its advantage in power for off road?
09 January 2025 10:50
It's a trade off, but it's a good trade off. Even with the extra weight the 450 feels more capable overall. It has more grunt to power through obstacles that would have bogged the 411 down and the power delivery is smoother as well. Additionally, most of us aren’t taking our adventure bikes to the extreme off road anyway – the 450 is plenty for the average adventure rider.

  Showing 21 - 40 of 46

1 2 3
Ask a Question