As long-distance tourers, what sets the KTM 390 Adventure apart from the Royal Enfield Himalayan 450?
The small-displacement adventure touring segment, both the KTM 390 Adventure and the Royal Enfield Himalayan 450, now have a growing fanbase. Because their intended use cases and price points are similar, they are often compared. The KTM is more sophisticated in its electronics, revvy engine, and sporty character, while we applaud the Himalayan 450 for its low-end torque, rugged simplicity, and comfortable ergonomics. A key aspect for many riders looking at these bikes is touring capability, i.e., comfort on extended rides, fuel economy, luggage capacity, and how easy the bikes are to maintain on the road. While these two tend to play out personal preference in riding styles, or brand loyalty, and even specific touring needs.
Well, the KTM is definitely better for all this mixed touring with lots of twisty roads. Its engine is more powerful, and its handling is a sporty affair on pavement.
If looking for pure long-distance comfort, I'd go for the Himalayan. After hours in the saddle, the upright seating position and good wind protection are a big deal.
Better fuel efficiency of the 390 Adventure puts it on a higher edge for touring. Of course, on long trips, you can go further between fill-ups.
All the way Himalayan for touring. Low-end torque is great for loaded riding, and it's easier to work on if something goes wrong in the middle of nowhere.
I've set up camp on both, and honestly, after touring on them both, I have more confidence in the KTM's more advanced electronics (like traction control and cornering ABS), especially in bad weather.
Simplicity is the Himalayan 450's strength for touring. Easier to fix if it goes wrong, and less to go wrong. And that engine is butter smooth at highway speed.
Plus, KTM’s dealer network is better in many countries—something that could make a big difference in case you break down on a long tour and need parts and service.
The lighter weight of the 390 Adventure means it’s easier to handle for the fully loaded touring version when you’re on narrow mountain roads.
For touring, the Himalayan is the bike I prefer. The leisurely pace is a bit more enjoyable. It’s not always about getting there the fastest.
Comment
Discussions and Questions As Long Distance Tourers What Sets The Ktm 390 Adventure Apart From The Royal Enfield Himalayan 450
No answers found .