Is the game changer the BYD Seagull or just another batch of Chinese junk?

Sukhmandeep Kaur on 04 February 2025 06:01
Mansi on 14 December 2024 19:37
I think it's a game-changer. From what I've seen the build quality seems pretty inline with the previous husk, and it's priced to die. Not luxury, not junk.

Gazal on 20 December 2024 17:14
Cheap Chinese junk, no doubt. With no room in the budget for a safe, reliable vehicle, there's no way they are going to make one for that price. Something's gotta give.

Nirati on 23 December 2024 15:42
It's probably somewhere in between. It's game changing price, but with likely somewhat of a compromise we haven't seen yet. The big question mark is long term reliability.

Neeraj on 01 January 2025 07:32
It’s probably decent quality for the price, but I wouldn’t trust it in a serious accident. China has different safety standards.

Divya on 05 January 2025 23:21
Game-changer for sure. It's not perfect, but it's seeing what we can do with an affordable EV. That's good for everyone.

Vibhu on 14 January 2025 14:13
I'm skeptical. Do you remember how people believed the Tata Nano would reinvent India's cars? Sometimes ultra-cheap isn't the answer.

Arjun on 19 January 2025 18:14
Calling it junk is unfair. They are leading in battery tech and have a good track record. This could be the Model T of EVs.

Punit on 27 January 2025 19:38
In concept, it’s a game changer, but I’ll wait and see how it performs in real world conditions outside of China.

Kuldeep on 04 February 2025 00:38
Absolutely! If you drive, the fuel savings alone would make up for the purchase price in a few years.

Kuldeep on 03 February 2025 16:37
I'm not convinced. You do save on gas, but that doesn't account for what repairs can cost. It may be difficult to find or expensive parts.

Rajat on 03 February 2025 12:41
It depends on your situation. It could be a massive money saver if you have cheap electricity and a short commute.

Rajat on 04 February 2025 04:53
Remember insurance and depreciation. New, unfamiliar or unproven brands might be more expensive to insure, and lose value quickly.

Sucheta on 03 February 2025 22:21
I think the environmental benefits make up for it even if the overall cost is a bit more.

Krishna on 03 February 2025 22:26
It's not just about money. And the convenience of never having to go to a gas station ever again is something too.

Sujit on 03 February 2025 23:20
No brainer in places where EV incentives exist. Practically, you could get paid to drive this thing.

Rahul on 03 February 2025 14:24
I would question the resale value, but the math probably works out. Will anyone want a used Chinese EV in 5 years?

Kunal on 03 February 2025 08:46
I'd feel fine. Small cars of today are so much safer than they used to be and EVs tend to have a low center of gravity which makes them more stable.

Richa on 03 February 2025 22:29
No way. That thing would crumple into a tin can with one hit from a big SUV. For highway driving, I’ll stick to the larger vehicles.

Abhinav on 03 February 2025 09:09
Most likely it is safer than we think. It's not about size; it's crumple zones and safety tech. I bet it does well in crash tests, better than expected.

Rana on 03 February 2025 14:59
I'd be nervous. It’s not so much the car itself that I worry about, it’s all the huge trucks and distracted drivers out there.

Abhinit on 03 February 2025 09:16
Safety is relative. Is it as safe as a Volvo? Probably not. Is it safer than a motorcycle or a 20 year old clunker? Absolutely.

Abhijeet on 03 February 2025 12:43
I would want to see some independent crash test results first. Other countries may have different Chinese safety standards.

Kuldeep on 03 February 2025 15:18
I find it an interesting question of perception versus reality. It may statistically be very safe, but I would still feel vulnerable.

Charu on 03 February 2025 21:12
Why not if it meets safety standards? All around the world, small cars drive on highways. It's more about defensive driving.

Ashish on 03 February 2025 16:51
The low top speed is actually a plus for highway safety. Slower is safer, right?

Akshat on 03 February 2025 10:31
Safety is not something I'd worry about while speed is not a problem either, but range anxiety is something I'd worry about on long highway trips. A crash seems scarier than running out of charge.

Prem on 03 February 2025 16:43
Absolutely. Just the price point would make other manufacturers raise their game. Perhaps this is the kick the US EV market needs.

Vivek on 03 February 2025 08:08
No way. Americans like bigger cars. Here, a tiny EV, even if cheap, won’t appeal to the mass market.

Monalisa on 03 February 2025 07:49
It would definitely shake things up though I don’t think it would take over. Or it could find a market for city dwellers and second cars.

Abhishek on 04 February 2025 00:38
It would be a fight tooth and nail to keep it out by the established brands. They’d argue that there were ‘safety concerns’ or some other excuse.

Pallavi on 03 February 2025 22:38
For lower income folks who have been priced out of the EV market it could be huge. That could be massively disruptive on its own.

Rahul on 04 February 2025 01:30
I'm skeptical. When it passes all the regulatory hoops, US companies will have played catch up and matched their own cheap EVs.

Monalisa on 03 February 2025 16:52
It would be a game-changer. What if everyone had an EV? It would be a massive environmental impact.

Preeti on 03 February 2025 11:12
The real disruption would be to force US companies to innovate faster. Competition is good for consumers.


Comment

Discussions and Questions Is The Game Changer The Byd Seagull Or Just Another Batch Of Chinese Junk


Ask a Question