Is the game changer the BYD Seagull or just another batch of Chinese junk?
No additional details provided.
BYD Seagull EV
Ad
Join the Discussion
Add a useful reply, help other readers, and earn points for a quality contribution.
Comments (34)
@rajat-mancover 1 year ago
Remember insurance and depreciation. New, unfamiliar or unproven brands might be more expensive to insure, and lose value quickly.
@rahul-kanjover 1 year ago
I'm skeptical. When it passes all the regulatory hoops, US companies will have played catch up and matched their own cheap EVs.
@abhishek-rover 1 year ago
It would be a fight tooth and nail to keep it out by the established brands. They’d argue that there were ‘safety concerns’ or some other excuse.
@kuldeep-teover 1 year ago
Absolutely! If you drive, the fuel savings alone would make up for the purchase price in a few years.
@sujit-kuamover 1 year ago
No brainer in places where EV incentives exist. Practically, you could get paid to drive this thing.
@pallavi-saover 1 year ago
For lower income folks who have been priced out of the EV market it could be huge. That could be massively disruptive on its own.
@richa-mittover 1 year ago
No way. That thing would crumple into a tin can with one hit from a big SUV. For highway driving, I’ll stick to the larger vehicles.
@krishna-boover 1 year ago
It's not just about money. And the convenience of never having to go to a gas station ever again is something too.
@sucheta-kuover 1 year ago
I think the environmental benefits make up for it even if the overall cost is a bit more.
@charu-jainover 1 year ago
Why not if it meets safety standards? All around the world, small cars drive on highways. It's more about defensive driving.
@monalisa-pover 1 year ago
It would be a game-changer. What if everyone had an EV? It would be a massive environmental impact.
@ashish-kumover 1 year ago
The low top speed is actually a plus for highway safety. Slower is safer, right?
@prem-shankover 1 year ago
Absolutely. Just the price point would make other manufacturers raise their game. Perhaps this is the kick the US EV market needs.
@kuldeep-teover 1 year ago
I'm not convinced. You do save on gas, but that doesn't account for what repairs can cost. It may be difficult to find or expensive parts.
@kuldeep-teover 1 year ago
I find it an interesting question of perception versus reality. It may statistically be very safe, but I would still feel vulnerable.
@rana-arunover 1 year ago
I'd be nervous. It’s not so much the car itself that I worry about, it’s all the huge trucks and distracted drivers out there.
@rahul-kanjover 1 year ago
I would question the resale value, but the math probably works out. Will anyone want a used Chinese EV in 5 years?
@abhijeet-rover 1 year ago
I would want to see some independent crash test results first. Other countries may have different Chinese safety standards.
@rajat-mancover 1 year ago
It depends on your situation. It could be a massive money saver if you have cheap electricity and a short commute.
@preeti-yadover 1 year ago
The real disruption would be to force US companies to innovate faster. Competition is good for consumers.
@akshat-vijover 1 year ago
Safety is not something I'd worry about while speed is not a problem either, but range anxiety is something I'd worry about on long highway trips. A crash seems scarier than running out of charge.
@abhinit-kuover 1 year ago
Safety is relative. Is it as safe as a Volvo? Probably not. Is it safer than a motorcycle or a 20 year old clunker? Absolutely.
@abhinav-guover 1 year ago
Most likely it is safer than we think. It's not about size; it's crumple zones and safety tech. I bet it does well in crash tests, better than expected.
@kunal-vikrover 1 year ago
I'd feel fine. Small cars of today are so much safer than they used to be and EVs tend to have a low center of gravity which makes them more stable.
@vivek-kumaover 1 year ago
No way. Americans like bigger cars. Here, a tiny EV, even if cheap, won’t appeal to the mass market.
@monalisa-pover 1 year ago
It would definitely shake things up though I don’t think it would take over. Or it could find a market for city dwellers and second cars.
@punit-kumaover 1 year ago
In concept, it’s a game changer, but I’ll wait and see how it performs in real world conditions outside of China.
@arjun-guptover 1 year ago
Calling it junk is unfair. They are leading in battery tech and have a good track record. This could be the Model T of EVs.
@vibhu-goelover 1 year ago
I'm skeptical. Do you remember how people believed the Tata Nano would reinvent India's cars? Sometimes ultra-cheap isn't the answer.
@divya-guptover 1 year ago
Game-changer for sure. It's not perfect, but it's seeing what we can do with an affordable EV. That's good for everyone.
@neeraj-gupover 1 year ago
It’s probably decent quality for the price, but I wouldn’t trust it in a serious accident. China has different safety standards.
@nirati-sriover 1 year ago
It's probably somewhere in between. It's game changing price, but with likely somewhat of a compromise we haven't seen yet. The big question mark is long term reliability.
@gazal-singover 1 year ago
Cheap Chinese junk, no doubt. With no room in the budget for a safe, reliable vehicle, there's no way they are going to make one for that price. Something's gotta give.
@mansi-upadover 1 year ago
I think it's a game-changer. From what I've seen the build quality seems pretty inline with the previous husk, and it's priced to die. Not luxury, not junk.
Ad
Start a Discussion & Win!
Ask questions, share insights, or start conversations about cars. Win ₹1,000 every week for engaging discussions.
Weekly Prize: ₹1,000
Most Popular Cars
Based on Cars Popular on Maxabout
3 models available
Available Models
3 models
Currently available for purchase

