Discussions and Questions Royal Enfield Hunter - Page 3
Is the Royal Enfield Hunter 350 really worth all the hype or is it just another overhyped Royal Enfield?
10 January 2025 12:16
It’s been a blast, I’ve had my Hunter for about 6 months now. It's not your typical thumper, but that's kinda the point. It’s light, nimble, and great for city riding. If you’re looking for something different from RE, then the hype is justified.
Is the Royal Enfield Hunter 350 really worth all the hype or is it just another overhyped Royal Enfield?
10 January 2025 12:16
Overhyped, definitely. I had a test ride on one and was pretty underwhelmed. The build quality is a question, it feels cheap in comparison to other REs. They seem to have cut too many corners to enable that price point.
Is the Royal Enfield Hunter 350 really worth all the hype or is it just another overhyped Royal Enfield?
10 January 2025 12:16
It's a mixed bag. The Hunter is a great new rider bike or for riders who want a modern RE experience. If you're looking for the classic Enfield feel, you might be disappointed, however. Some people think it’s worth the hype, others don’t.
Is the Royal Enfield Hunter 350 really worth all the hype or is it just another overhyped Royal Enfield?
10 January 2025 12:16
People are missing the point, I think. He's not trying to be a Classic or a Bullet. RE is trying to catch the younger riders and from what I can see, it's working. Not taking itself too seriously, it's a fun little bike.
Is the Royal Enfield Hunter 350 really worth all the hype or is it just another overhyped Royal Enfield?
10 January 2025 12:16
I am a long time RE fan, and so I was a bit skeptical at first. I get it now, though, after riding my friend's Hunter. It’s not perfect, but it’s a step in the right direction for the brand. If you understand what RE is doing here, the hype is justified.
One thing that wasn’t obvious until you ran into a few people who had owned one of the Hunter 350 is that, even with Royal Enfield’s notorious recent reliability then and consistent records now, the new Hunter seems even worse.
10 January 2025 12:16
In fact, the Hunter has been more reliable than my old Classic 350. The simpler design seems to have fewer potential failure points, and less vibration means fewer things rattling loose.
One thing that wasn’t obvious until you ran into a few people who had owned one of the Hunter 350 is that, even with Royal Enfield’s notorious recent reliability then and consistent records now, the new Hunter seems even worse.
10 January 2025 12:16
I have had my Hunter for about 8 months and have been back to the service center three times already. It’s nothing major but annoying little things keep popping up. The Meteor feels less reliable than my friend's.
One thing that wasn’t obvious until you ran into a few people who had owned one of the Hunter 350 is that, even with Royal Enfield’s notorious recent reliability then and consistent records now, the new Hunter seems even worse.
10 January 2025 12:16
It's hit or miss. For some people I know, they have zero issues, others have little issues all the time. I believe RE's quality control is still uneven across the board.
One thing that wasn’t obvious until you ran into a few people who had owned one of the Hunter 350 is that, even with Royal Enfield’s notorious recent reliability then and consistent records now, the new Hunter seems even worse.
10 January 2025 12:16
I've heard suspension and exhaust issues with the Hunter, but engine and electronics seem more reliable. It’s probably not a huge leap forward, but it’s probably on par with other recent RE models.
One thing that wasn’t obvious until you ran into a few people who had owned one of the Hunter 350 is that, even with Royal Enfield’s notorious recent reliability then and consistent records now, the new Hunter seems even worse.
10 January 2025 12:16
I've worked on a few Hunters before, as a mechanic. The good thing about them is that they are easier to work on than other REs, for reliability. They still have some of the typical RE quirks, but.
One thing that wasn’t obvious until you ran into a few people who had owned one of the Hunter 350 is that, even with Royal Enfield’s notorious recent reliability then and consistent records now, the new Hunter seems even worse.
10 January 2025 12:16
It’s reliable if you stay on top of maintenance, I think. I’ve seen a lot of the issues from people not riding according to the service schedule or pushing the bike too hard too soon before the break in period is completed.
One thing that wasn’t obvious until you ran into a few people who had owned one of the Hunter 350 is that, even with Royal Enfield’s notorious recent reliability then and consistent records now, the new Hunter seems even worse.
10 January 2025 12:16
The Hunter just doesn't feel as reliable to me, as it does coming from Japanese bikes. It has character, and there are occasional hiccups, but that’s what makes up for it. Right, all part of the RE experience.
Is the Hunter 350's lighter weight and nimble handling somehow a trade off of the classic Royal Enfield 'feel' that we're used to?
10 January 2025 12:16
I think the Hunter is right. There's just enough of that RE character but not so much you feel like a dinosaur. It’s way more fun in the city because of the lighter weight.
Is the Hunter 350's lighter weight and nimble handling somehow a trade off of the classic Royal Enfield 'feel' that we're used to?
10 January 2025 12:16
It's lost the plot for me. The Hunter is a proper Enfield, but it feels more like a generic commuter. The Classic was solid and planted, and I miss that.
Is the Hunter 350's lighter weight and nimble handling somehow a trade off of the classic Royal Enfield 'feel' that we're used to?
10 January 2025 12:16
It's just different 'feel' but not necessarily worse. I think it's more playful and less intimidating, and will attract new riders to the brand. It's still got RE DNA, just evolved.
Is the Hunter 350's lighter weight and nimble handling somehow a trade off of the classic Royal Enfield 'feel' that we're used to?
10 January 2025 12:16
Having owned both a Classic and a Hunter I would say that the Hunter actually seems to feel more engaging to ride. With the lighter weight you feel more connected to the road.
Is the Hunter 350's lighter weight and nimble handling somehow a trade off of the classic Royal Enfield 'feel' that we're used to?
10 January 2025 12:16
RE feel is overrated, the classic feel. The Hunter is more practical, and still has plenty of character. This is a modern take on what an Enfield can be.
Is the Hunter 350's lighter weight and nimble handling somehow a trade off of the classic Royal Enfield 'feel' that we're used to?
10 January 2025 12:16
I didn't believe him at first, but the Hunter's grown on me. It's still Royal Enfield, but in a different way, and it's got its own unique feel.
Is the Hunter 350's lighter weight and nimble handling somehow a trade off of the classic Royal Enfield 'feel' that we're used to?
10 January 2025 12:16
It’s great that it’s lighter weight, but I do miss the distinctive thump. The Hunter is a bit too refined for my taste. It's a trade-off.
Where can I purchase a Royal Enfield Hunter?
07 September 2023 07:00
You can purchase a Royal Enfield Hunter from authorized Royal Enfield dealerships. It's recommended to visit the official Royal Enfield website to find a dealership near you.
Ask a Question