In real world riding, how does the Pulsar N160’s engine compare to the NS160?

Ashutosh on 30 January 2025 09:19
The Bajaj Pulsar N160 and NS160 are both the same displacement but different engine architecture. The NS160 has a more traditional air cooled unit while the N160 uses a new air oil cooled engine. The result has been much discussion and debate among riders regarding the real world performance differences. Every aspect from low end torque, mid range punch, top end performance, fuel efficiency, to engine heat management in different riding conditions are points of contention. There are those who say the N160's newer engine design gives it a bit of an edge, and then there are those who say the NS160's tried and tested motor is more reliable and fun. Often, the discussion extends to how these engines hold up in city traffic, highway cruising and some spirited riding on twisty roads.
Mansi on 06 December 2024 06:34
I've been on both and the N160's engine is definitely more refined. At higher RPMs it is smoother and doesn’t vibrate as much as the NS160. Compared with the N160, the N160 is definitely more comfortable for daily commuting.

Deepak on 14 December 2024 04:55
Disagree. The engine might be older in the NS160 but it’s more fun. In the low end it’s peppier and is great for jumping in traffic. The N160, however, feels a bit dull in comparison.

Sucheta on 23 December 2024 18:26
You're both missing the point. The engine of the N160 is better for touring. At highway speeds it is more relaxed and doesn't heat up as much in stop and go traffic. It’s the clear winner for long rides.

Sana on 29 December 2024 17:23
The NS160's engine is what I like best as a mechanic. It's easier and it's simpler to work on. Most riders don’t need the added complexity of the N160’s oil cooling system.

Shobhit on 07 January 2025 00:08
Truthfully, for most riders the difference is negligible. Both engines are good. Though the N160 might be a bit more refined, the NS160 has proven itself. It’s a matter of personal preference.

Aditi on 10 January 2025 14:06
I think the N160’s engine is overrated. Yeah, it's smoother, but it's not character. Overall, the NS160 feels more like a proper Pulsar – it’s gruntier and more engaging to ride.

Mansi on 15 January 2025 01:53
Fuel efficiency, you guys forget. My experience is that the N160 always runs better on mileage, especially in city riding. That's a big deal for a lot of this segment's buyers.


Comment

Discussions and Questions In Real World Riding How Does The Pulsar N160s Engine Compare To The Ns160

No answers found .

Ask a Question