How does the KTM 1290 Super Adventure stack up in reliability to Japanese adventure bikes?
Reliability is a big deal to many adventure bike riders, particularly those riding longer distances or into remote areas. In recent years KTM has made massive strides in terms of build quality and reliability, and while some riders will still be concerned about how the 1290 Super Adventure compares to its Japanese rivals, everyone who has given this machine a chance has been quietly won over. Earlier models are said to suffer from electrical issues and other problems. But some KTM owners sing the bike’s praises and say they haven’t had any problems. It is a question about real-world experience and perception of the 1290 Super Adventure's reliability versus the legions of adventure bikes built by Honda, Yamaha, and Suzuki, all with decades of reputation for building durable machines.
I have 30,000 miles on mine and never a problem. It’s been as reliable as my old Yamaha, but regular maintenance is key.
It's improved for sure, but I don't trust it as much as a Japanese bike for a round-the-world trip. It can be finicky electronics.
I have heard horror stories about earlier years, but my 2022 model has been flawless. It seems KTM is really stepping up their game lately.
It's bulletproof, but there have been some annoying electrical gremlins. Not major, just more quirks than I had with my Honda.
It's a toss-up. I have friends with problem-free KTMs and friends with nightmares. Luck of the draw, I guess.
Parts availability might be a problem compared to Japanese bikes, but the reliability is fine, except in remote areas.
Both are owned by me, and honestly, the gap isn’t nearly as big as it used to be. My old Suzuki V-Strom has been just as reliable as my KTM.
Comment
Discussions and Questions How Does The Ktm 1290 Super Adventure Stack Up In Reliability To Japanese Adventure Bikes
Ask a Question