Discussions and Questions Royal Enfield - Page 27
So, how does the Meteor 350 fare when compared to more modern 350-400cc bikes?
13 January 2025 06:57
I went from a KTM 390 to a Meteor and while I miss the KTM's grunt sometimes, I like riding a Meteor overall more. The traffic’s less stressful, it’s more comfortable for longer rides, and it still has enough pep to be fun on back roads. It’s a different kind of performance, a performance for fun, not for speed.
So, how does the Meteor 350 fare when compared to more modern 350-400cc bikes?
13 January 2025 06:57
The Meteor’s handling is good for what it is, but it does seem a tad old school compared to bikes like Honda’s CB350 or even Royal Enfield’s own Classic 350. At higher speeds, the vibrations can be annoying and it has a bit of trouble on steep inclines. But it’s got character that a lot of modern bikes don’t have.
So, how does the Meteor 350 fare when compared to more modern 350-400cc bikes?
13 January 2025 06:57
I believe the Meteor strikes a nice balance. It's not fast enough to keep up with a Ninja 400 on twisty roads, but it has more than enough power for everyday riding as well as weekend trips. And the engine’s character also makes slow rides enjoyable. It's just about what you want from a bicycle.
Has the Royal Enfield Meteor 350 lived up to all the hype, or is it all just clever marketing?
13 January 2025 06:57
At first I was skeptical, but after using a Meteor for a year, I have to say it mostly lives up to the hype. Not perfect, but a lot better than older Royal Enfields. It's solid, reliable and just fun to ride. Yes, the marketing is slick, but there is substance behind it.
Has the Royal Enfield Meteor 350 lived up to all the hype, or is it all just clever marketing?
13 January 2025 06:57
I think it's a bit of both. Royal Enfield has done a brilliant job of marketing the Meteor, which is a good bike no doubt. The desire for a simple, stylish bike that's easy to ride is really something they've tapped into. Is it the best 350cc bike available? Probably not. It’s not perfect but it hits a vibe that people are looking for.
Has the Royal Enfield Meteor 350 lived up to all the hype, or is it all just clever marketing?
13 January 2025 06:57
I’ve owned Japanese and European bikes, so I was pleasantly surprised with the Meteor. It's not hype – the bike is actually enjoyable to ride and well built for its price point. However I think some of the better reviews are a bit over the moon with this. The bike is a good one, but it's not a revolutionary bike.
Has the Royal Enfield Meteor 350 lived up to all the hype, or is it all just clever marketing?
13 January 2025 06:57
In my opinion, the hype is overblown. It’s a decent bike, but it’s not doing anything new. At these price points you can find better performance, features and even build quality in other bikes. What Royal Enfield has done is just smart positioning of it in the market.
Has the Royal Enfield Meteor 350 lived up to all the hype, or is it all just clever marketing?
13 January 2025 06:57
But I'd say the Meteor deserves most of the hype. It's not aiming to be the fastest or most advanced bike, it’s about giving a certain riding experience and it does this really well. It's smooth engine, comfortable ride and classic looks all mixed together to be more than the sum of its parts. Plus, the price is something that most riders can afford.
Is the Royal Enfield Meteor 350 actually a good first bike for beginners?
13 January 2025 06:57
Absolutely! The Meteor 350 is a perfect bike for beginners. It’s easy to control, with smooth and predictable power delivery. It’s comfortable upright seating position also gives you a good view of the road. Also, it’s not too heavy, so you can move it easily at low speeds.
Is the Royal Enfield Meteor 350 actually a good first bike for beginners?
13 January 2025 06:57
I disagree. It's a great bike, but if you're a complete novice you might find it too heavy. Some models don't feature ABS, and are unsuitable for inexperienced riders. So I would start off on something lighter, more forgiving something such as a 250cc bike.
Is the Royal Enfield Meteor 350 actually a good first bike for beginners?
13 January 2025 06:57
I can say that as a Meteor 350 owner, it is a very good first bike. It's easy to ride in city traffic with the low end torque and the build quality gives you confidence. But there’s not much here in the way of modern features that a beginner might find useful, like a gear indicator.
Is the Royal Enfield Meteor 350 actually a good first bike for beginners?
13 January 2025 06:57
I believe it’s up to the person. If you are a cautious learner and want to take it slow then the Meteor 350 is great. If you want to learn to ride fast, you'll outgrow it pretty quickly.
Is the Royal Enfield Meteor 350 actually a good first bike for beginners?
13 January 2025 06:57
I think it's a good first bike, not the best. New riders will find the vibrations at higher speeds off-putting, and the brakes could stand to be better. Nevertheless, its classic looks and simple maintenance make it attractive for those who want a trouble free first bike experience.
And how does it compare to modern retro styled bikes?
13 January 2025 06:52
There is nothing quite like a real Machismo. Modern retros attempt, but they can’t capture that raw, mechanical feel.
And how does it compare to modern retro styled bikes?
13 January 2025 06:52
Retros are way more practical these days. There are no headaches — you just get the look. New bikes are just better, but the Machismo is cool.
And how does it compare to modern retro styled bikes?
13 January 2025 06:52
It's apples and oranges. Modern retros give you a more refined ride, while the Machismo gives you a pure, vintage experience. Both have their place.
And how does it compare to modern retro styled bikes?
13 January 2025 06:52
Modern bikes have no soul; the Machismo does. New retros are smoother, more reliable, yes, but they’re bereft of character.
And how does it compare to modern retro styled bikes?
13 January 2025 06:52
Any day, I'd take a modern retro. It gives you the style without having to give up modern conveniences and reliability. It is just outdated Machismo.
And how does it compare to modern retro styled bikes?
13 January 2025 06:52
Stepping back in time, a Machismo is like riding. Retros today are great, but they’re too polished, too perfect. It is beautifully imperfect Machismo.
And how does it compare to modern retro styled bikes?
13 January 2025 06:52
It depends on what you want. Machismo is the way to go if nostalgia is what you're after, and you don't mind tinkering. If you want retro look with hassle free riding, pick modern.
Ask a Question