Discussions and Questions Bajaj Pulsar - Page 32
How does the Pulsar N160 2-Channel ABS fare, in terms of overall riding experience, when compared to its competitors?
30 January 2025 09:21
It feels more planted than the N160's competitors. It's a typical Pulsar torque which makes it fun in city traffic.
How does the Pulsar N160 2-Channel ABS fare, in terms of overall riding experience, when compared to its competitors?
30 January 2025 09:21
I have ridden the N160 as well as Apache RTR 160 4V. The Pulsar has better low end grunt, but it’s got an Apache like feel more.
How does the Pulsar N160 2-Channel ABS fare, in terms of overall riding experience, when compared to its competitors?
30 January 2025 09:21
There is no question that the N160 is one of the most comfortable on the market. I've never had back pain on a 300km ride. The FZ-S can't say the same.
How does the Pulsar N160 2-Channel ABS fare, in terms of overall riding experience, when compared to its competitors?
30 January 2025 09:21
While X-Blade may have better build quality, the N160 gets an edge with the dual channel ABS.
How does the Pulsar N160 2-Channel ABS fare, in terms of overall riding experience, when compared to its competitors?
30 January 2025 09:21
I went from a Yamaha to the N160 and I really miss the smoothness of the Yamaha engine. Overall, the Pulsar's got better features, though.
How does the Pulsar N160 2-Channel ABS fare, in terms of overall riding experience, when compared to its competitors?
30 January 2025 09:21
It's a mixed bag. The N160 has solid power delivery, with vibrations at high speed that can be quite annoying. Still better than most competitors though.
How does the Pulsar N160 2-Channel ABS fare, in terms of overall riding experience, when compared to its competitors?
30 January 2025 09:21
I would go with the N160 if it was pure riding pleasure. Which lacks some of the refinement present in a few of the other ones, but has a raw, sporty feel.
Can the Pulsar N160 tackle long distance touring?
30 January 2025 09:19
I made a 500km trip on the N160, and it did surprisingly well. The engine doesn't seem to be worked hard at highway speeds, and the seat is comfortable enough. While it’s no tourer, it’s easily capable of weekend trips.
Can the Pulsar N160 tackle long distance touring?
30 January 2025 09:19
Are you kidding? The N160 is just too small for proper touring. With a tiny fuel tank, you’re stopping all the time; and with no wind protection, long ride are a pain. This one’s for short trips only.
Can the Pulsar N160 tackle long distance touring?
30 January 2025 09:19
It's all about expectations I think. The N160 is a great budget touring guitar. It's efficient, it’s reliable, and it’s comfortable enough. It won't compete with the bigger bikes built for touring, but don't expect it to.
Can the Pulsar N160 tackle long distance touring?
30 January 2025 09:19
You're forgetting about modifications. The N160 could be a decent light tourer with a bigger windscreen, some soft luggage and a comfier seat. And it works well, I've done it.
Can the Pulsar N160 tackle long distance touring?
30 January 2025 09:19
If you are used to smaller bikes, the N160 is fine for touring. If you have ridden larger machines you will find it wanting. It’s all how you look at things and what you are used to.
Can the Pulsar N160 tackle long distance touring?
30 January 2025 09:19
Touring on a 160cc bike will always be a compromise, let’s be real. The N160 does it better than most in its class, however. Overall the engine is smooth and the ergonomics are decent, 'making it bearable for longer rides.'
Can the Pulsar N160 tackle long distance touring?
30 January 2025 09:19
I think people don’t realize how good small bikes are for touring. On twisty roads, the N160 is light, nimble and easy to handle. In fact, it’s ideal for exploring backroads and small towns.
Is the Pulsar N160 the safest bike in its segment as Bajaj claims?
30 January 2025 09:19
I believe Bajaj is right. This makes dual channel ABS a game changer in this segment. It's saved my ass a couple of times already. It’s also quite stable overall.
Is the Pulsar N160 the safest bike in its segment as Bajaj claims?
30 January 2025 09:19
It’s not the safest because of ABS alone. I’d argue that the Apache RTR 160 4V has better handling and brakes, which are more important for everyday safety. ABS on the N160 is great, but that’s not all there is.
Is the Pulsar N160 the safest bike in its segment as Bajaj claims?
30 January 2025 09:19
You're both missing the point. It’s more about the rider than the bike. The N160 does everything very nicely, but if you behave like an idiot, no amount of ABS will save you.
Is the Pulsar N160 the safest bike in its segment as Bajaj claims?
30 January 2025 09:19
I can say that the N160's safety features are legit because I've crashed with and without ABS. However, Bajaj needs to spend the effort educating riders on how to use these features.
Is the Pulsar N160 the safest bike in its segment as Bajaj claims?
30 January 2025 09:19
The truth is, the safest bike is the one you’re most comfortable riding. To some, that may be the N160. It could be a different bike for others. It's subjective.
Is the Pulsar N160 the safest bike in its segment as Bajaj claims?
30 January 2025 09:19
I believe there is more marketing than reality to the N160's safety claim. It has good features, but safety isn’t the only factor. Build quality and long term reliability also play a role. These we need more time to judge.
Ask a Question