Would a strong hybrid powertrain option from Maruti Suzuki be a good idea in the Ciaz?

Ashutosh on 31 December 2024 07:45
Due to the focus on efficiency of the fuel and the current environmental concerns, the hybrid powertrain is using more and more in the automotive industry. Some say that a strong hybrid system would enhance its appeal and competitiveness greatly, and Maruti Suzuki has already introduced mild hybrid technology in the Ciaz. This could potentially put the Ciaz in direct competition with vehicles like the Honda City e:This is HEV with better fuel economy and lower emissions. But it would probably make the car more expensive, maybe even more than a segment higher. But then there is the question of whether Maruti Suzuki’s target audience for the Ciaz would be willing to pay a premium for hybrid technology. Some enthusiasts also say that a strong hybrid system may dilute the Ciaz’s simplicity and ease of maintenance, which are currently two of its strong points.
Kuldeep on 14 November 2024 01:11
Absolutely! It would be amazing to have a strong hybrid Ciaz. It could easily compete with the City e:They offer killer fuel efficiency, and also HEV. If they made it, I'd definitely be considering buying one.

Saket on 21 November 2024 11:53
I don't think it's necessary. For most users, the current mild hybrid system is good enough. They'd just create a more expensive and complicated thing to maintain.

Shashank on 27 November 2024 16:24
It's a tough call. The Ciaz is great for efficiency, but a strong hybrid would price it out of the current segment. The pricing would have to be taken care of by Maruti.

Shinde on 06 December 2024 17:33
I would love to see a strong hybrid Ciaz as long as Maruti can keep the price reasonable. If they can do it all – performance, efficiency, and cost – it could be a game changer.

Sourabh on 11 December 2024 18:57
Why not? This would make the Ciaz have a unique selling point in its segment. And with fuel prices rising all the time, the long term savings could make up for the higher initial cost.


Comment