What is the Tata Safari’s build quality like relative to its competitors?
As a vehicle, the Build Quality plays a very crucial role as it is being positioned in the premium SUV segment and the Tata Safari is one of it. One thing several owners have commented on is the Safari's build quality—occasionally good (solid feel), occasionally questionable (inconsistent panel gaps, interior fit and finish and reliability). In this price bracket, the Mahindra XUV700, Hyundai Alcazar and MG Hector Plus all have a reputation for build quality. The discussion usually revolves around whether Tata has been able to meet or surpass the benchmarks set by more established players in market and whether the occasional quality problems reported are just teething problems or the sign of deeper problems.
So far, I’ve seen the build quality of the Safari's vary. There are some units that seem rock solid, but there are other units with weird panel gaps and rattles. That's not up to par with the Germans.
Tata's done a decent job with the Safari, I think. Overall it feels pretty solid and the interior materials are a huge step up from their older models. It's not perfect, but it’s competitive.
I would say the Safari falls short compared to something like the XUV700. It seems Mahindra has better consistency in build quality among their units.
As far as an owner, the build quality is good, not great. It’s not perfect, but there are some minor issues here and there, nothing that’s going to break the deal. I feel it’s on par with other Indian brands.
The exterior build feels solid but them interior quality is what it loses points. It’s let down in comparison to rivals by things like inconsistent panel fitment and some cheap plastics.
Comment
Discussions and Questions What Is The Tata Safari S Build Quality Like Relative To Its Competitors
No answers found .