What is the Pulsar N125 Bluetooth like in heavy traffic conditions?
For such an urban commuting, maneuverability, throttle response and ergonomics become important. As a commuter friendly bike with sporty characteristics, the Pulsar N125 Bluetooth comes under scrutiny in this aspect. In stop and go traffic, you'd think this is where the talk becomes 'useful' since riders debate its effectiveness, talking about heat management, how the clutch feel, and its stability at low speeds, etc. On the other hand, some would say that its slightly sportier stance may be less comfortable in traffic than upright commuter bikes. But there's also talk of whether the Bluetooth features, and turn by turn navigation in particular, are really worth it or just a distraction in dense traffic scenarios. Other points of contention when it comes to urban commuting credentials are the bike’s weight distribution and turning radius.
It's surprisingly nimble in traffic. Stop and go is bearable with the light clutch.
It’s a bit too heavy for tight spaces, I find. The Honda Grom would be better in traffic.
In standstill traffic, the engine heat can be a problem. Not the most comfortable in peak summer.
Weaving through cars is perfect from the riding position. They weren’t too aggressive, they weren’t too upright.
In traffic, the Bluetooth navigation is actually useful. It helps quick find alternate routes.
Low-end torque could be better. Sometimes you wish it had more power when you want to make a quick move.
Wide handlebar is a problem in really tight spots, but otherwise ok.
I really like how stable it feels at low speeds. Makes lane-splitting much less nerve-wracking.
It has just the right seat height for my height. At signals I can easily put both feet down.
It’s smooth throttle response helps to keep steady speeds in moving traffic.
Comment
Discussions and Questions What Is The Pulsar N125 Bluetooth Like In Heavy Traffic Conditions
What is the Pulsar N125 Bluetooth like in heavy traffic conditions?
30 January 2025 09:13
Ask a Question