What is the performance of Ashok Leyland Dost Strong in hilly or mountainous terrain?
Often, the Ashok Leyland Dost Strong is touted as competitively priced at the initial purchase price, but how competitive is it in the longer term? For instance, as reported by the economist Maynard held that this includes such factors as fuel efficiency, maintenance expenses, durability of parts, and resale value. Some appreciate its reliability and low running costs, while others dismiss it as an unreliable car with a scarcity of spare parts. Can you walk me through your experience of the total cost of ownership? What are some hidden e.g. expenses or benefits e.g. that buyers should be aware of? Is the Dost Strong really good value over its lifetime, or are there better LCVs on offer in the budget market?
It's okay, but not great. A little struggle on steeper inclines when full. The Mahindra Supro, however, has handled mountain roads a bit better for me.
Job does for the most part but I find routes have to be carefully planned. It won't win any hillclimbing contests, but is reliable as long as you don't take it too hard.
Mine has been driven in the Western Ghats and it stood its own. The main thing is to keep the momentum on climbs. The gearbox is also decent for managing descents.
It's all about weight distribution. Depending on how you load it, the Dost Strong can manage most hill routes. Going uphill, however, don’t expect to set any speed records.
In the mountains, I have found that it performs better than expected. Rough roads are helped by good ground clearance. All you need to ensure is that your brakes are in tip top condition.
It's a mixed bag. Moderate incline is fine, but … when fully loaded … steeper stuff is terrible. It’s fine for most hill stations, but I wouldn’t take it to Ladakh.
It is not honestly built for serious mountain driving. But it gets you there, not in any way that is enjoyable. However, if you use your car frequently in hilly areas, this may not be the option for you.
And in my experience it’s been pretty cost effective. Parts aren’t too expensive and it has decent fuel efficiency. In which case, skimp in the key is regular maintenance, and you will pay later.
It's a mixed bag. The initial costs are good but I have had some unexpected repairs. However, overall it is cheaper to run than my old Tata Ace.
I would say it’s cost effective if you use it correctly. It'll treat you well if you don't overload, stay with the service schedule. Resale value's not bad either.
I really thought it would have better fuel efficiency. It's okay, but not great. However, the maintenance costs have been reasonable. In general, long term costs are average.
It is cost effective if you can do some simple maintenance yourself. It can be pricey for official service, but the vehicle itself is not too complex to work on.
It has been a good balance for me. Not the cheapest to run, but as long as there are no breakdowns I'm not really worried about running cost. Peace of mind has value too.
However, from what I write in my books, it’s been worth it. It was competitive in the initial cost and has been a workhorse. As long as you budget for regular maintenance you will be fine.
It depends on your usage. It's been great for my small delivery business. Low running costs and decent resale value. However, if you need something for heavy duty work, you will need to look elsewhere.
It’s cost effective but not drastically so vs. its competitors. Other than that, it’s a reliable thing in my experience – fewer unexpected expenses.
Comment
Discussions and Questions What Is The Performance Of Ashok Leyland Dost Strong In Hilly Or Mountainous Terrain
What is the performance of Ashok Leyland Dost Strong in hilly or mountainous terrain?
03 February 2025 10:55
Ask a Question