So how does the Royal Enfield Scrambler 450 fare as an overall package and in the value proposition vis a vis the Triumph Scrambler 400X?
The Royal Enfield Scrambler 450 and Triumph Scrambler 400X are modern reinterpretations of the classic scrambler design, targeting urban riders who fancy retro styling and occasional light off road use. The comparison between these two bikes has caused a lot of arguments between motorcycle enthusiasts in markets where both bikes are available. The debate usually centers on things like brand heritage, performance, features, build quality, and after sales support. The Triumph has the cachet of the Triumph brand, and the RE has the larger engine and (perhaps) more power. There is a very important role for price in this comparison, and it tends to leave the RE as the cheaper one. Triumph's higher price tag is weighed up by riders whether its features and brand value are worth it or if RE provides value for money. The bikes' authenticity as scramblers and actual off road capabilities are also compared.
RE is far more value for money. It’s more bike for less cash.
The build quality is another level from Triumph. The extra cost is definitely worth it for the premium feel.
I'd go for the RE. It has more tuning potential and should have a bigger engine.
Overall the Triumph has better components. Suspension and brakes are a step up.
It all depends on what you want. The Triumph feels more like a styled road bike and the RE feels more like a proper scrambler.
The long term maintenance of the RE will be cheaper. It’s easier to get parts and service.
Just for the brand prestige I'd choose the Triumph. It's a conversation starter.
The second is more practical in daily use. It has a bigger fuel tank and is most likely more fuel efficient.
Comment
Discussions and Questions So How Does The Royal Enfield Scrambler 450 Fare As An Overall Package And In The Value Proposition Vis A Vis The Triumph Scrambler 400X
Ask a Question