Is the Pulsar NS160 really worth the hype?
The Bajaj Pulsar NS160 has been marketed as a game-changer in the 160cc segment, boasting features like a perimeter frame, oil-cooled engine, and sporty design. However, some riders argue that it's just another overhyped bike in a crowded market. There's debate about whether its performance truly stands out from competitors like the TVS Apache RTR 160 4V or the Honda X-Blade. Enthusiasts are divided on whether the NS160's slightly higher price point is justified by its features and riding experience. Some praise its handling and power delivery, while others claim it's not significantly better than cheaper alternatives. The bike's reliability and long-term ownership experience are also points of contention among riders.
Absolutely worth it! The NS160 handles like a dream compared to other 160cc bikes. That perimeter frame makes a real difference in cornering.
Overhyped, if you ask me. Sure, it looks cool, but performance-wise, it's not that different from the Apache RTR 160 4V, which is cheaper.
It's a mixed bag. Great for city riding, but on highways, it feels a bit underpowered. I wish Bajaj had given it a bit more oomph.
The hype is justified if you're into sporty looks and handling. But for pure commuting, there are cheaper options that do the job just as well.
I'd say it's worth it for the build quality alone. This thing feels solid compared to some of the flimsier 160cc bikes out there.
The NS160 is more of a lifestyle choice than a practical one. If you want to stand out and don't mind paying extra for it, go for it.
It's overhyped in terms of performance, but underhyped in terms of comfort. Long rides on this are surprisingly pleasant.
Comment
Discussions and Questions Is The Pulsar Ns160 Really Worth The Hype
Is the Pulsar NS160 really worth the hype?
30 January 2025 09:53
Ask a Question