Is the KTM 890 Adventure’s stock seat comfortable enough for long-distance touring?
Many adventure riders, particularly those who tour, will tell you that seat comfort is a big deal. There has been some negative and some positive feedback on the KTM 890 Adventure’s stock seat. Among the standard and R models, the seat height and shape are different, which could impact its comfort and rider confidence. For those embarking on multi-day trips or long highway stretches, is the stock seat enough, or will an aftermarket solution be necessary? How does the seat stack up against other adventure bikes in terms of all-day comfort?
The stock seat is fine for a few hours, but after that, my butt starts to complain. Touring definitely warrants an aftermarket option.
In fact, I quite like the stock seat. Did a 500-mile day with no issue. Everyone's different, though.
The R's seat is definitely more off-road focused and less comfy on longer highway stretches. If you do most of your riding on the road, consider swapping it.
I threw an Airhawk cushion on the stock seat, and now it’s perfect for long days. Also cheaper than a whole new seat.
The KTM's seat is a plank compared to my old BMW. It's not terrible, not great for iron butt types.
I replaced mine with a Seat Concepts kit. Long rides are a night-and-day difference. The best upgrade I've made to the bike.
The stock seat locks you into one position, and that shape of the seat is not comfortable over time. A lot of help comes from an aftermarket seat with a flatter profile.
Comment
Discussions and Questions Is The Ktm 890 Adventures Stock Seat Comfortable Enough For Long Distance Touring
No answers found .