Is the Kia Ceed’s resale value worse than more established brands?
When you buy a new car it is important to consider resale value as it will impact on the total cost of owning the vehicle. As a brand, Kia has long been associated with giving you more 'bang for your buck,' which has often weighed down on the resale values compared with those other, perhaps more illustrious, marques. This trend may be changing, however, with recent improvements in quality and perception. As a core model for Kia, the Ceed has a lot of importance in this equation. But some say that Kia's improved reputation and the Ceed itself, with its competitive features, make it a good bet for resale. Some argue that it can't even match the residual values of established European brands. There’s also the question of how different variants of the Ceed hold their value — do sportier or higher spec models hold their value better in the used market?
When I sold my Ceed I was surprised how well it held its value. It’s not as bad as people make it out to be.
The Ceed definitely depreciated way more than my old Ford Focus. It's still a concern for Kia.
It seems the higher spec models hold their value better. My friend's base model was harder to sell than my GT Line.
Kia's 7 year warranty helps on resale. That extra peace of mind is beloved by used buyers.
It's not great, but the lower initial cost sort of makes up for that compared to pricier brands.
I think it's improving. To me, newer Ceeds are doing better on the used market than older ones did.
With the current fuel prices, the diesel models hold their value pretty well.
But the gap is definitely closing and it's still not as good as a Golf or Focus.
Comment
Discussions and Questions Is The Kia Ceeds Resale Value Worse Than More Established Brands
No answers found .