Is the CT 100 ES really cost effective long term?
Low cost and high fuel efficiency of the Bajaj CT 100 ES are often the main reasons why people buy this bike. But its true cost effectiveness over time is still up for debate. Some owners say they spend almost nothing on maintenance for several years, while others complain about the accumulation of frequent small repairs. A lot of the discussion compares the CT 100 ES to slightly pricier competitors, wondering if it's worth paying extra upfront for a bike that may be more reliable. When evaluating the bike’s long term economic value, some of the factors to consider include the availability and cost of spare parts, how often it would need to be serviced and the bike’s resale value.
Absolutely. In 5 years I have spent peanuts on maintenance and it still gives me 80+ kmpl. Can't beat that economy.
It's cheap until it isn't. Those little repairs add up real quick, and next thing you know you've spent more than on a better bike.
It’s just depends on your luck, I guess. Some people say they are the best invention, ever, while others say they’re worse than a curse. It's a gamble.
It's unbeatable for pure commuting. If you want more than that from your bike, however, you will ultimately pay more.
Its simplicity is the real cost effectiveness. Most things can be fixed with basic tools.
I did the math, and if you repair it, it’s still cheaper than most alternatives over a 5 year period.
If your time isn't valuable, it's cost effective. Add in all the hours spent at the mechanic and it's a different story.
Comment
Discussions and Questions Is The Ct 100 Es Really Cost Effective Long Term
Is the CT 100 ES really cost effective long term?
15 January 2025 09:39
Ask a Question