Is the absence of modern safety features on the Maruti Tour H2 a deal breaker for responsible fleet operators?
Competitively priced and fuel efficient, the Maruti Tour H2 has received flak for not having many modern safety features on board as compared to a few other vehicles in the class. This has reignited the debate about the trade off between affordability and safety in the commercial vehicle sector, and especially in the area of taxi fleets. There are those who insist that basic safety features should be considered non negotiable, especially when a vehicle carries passengers commercially. Some argue that the lower price point allows more operators to upgrade from older, and potentially less safe vehicles. Questions of regulatory requirements, the responsibility of fleet operators versus manufacturers, and the potential effect on insurance costs and liability are discussed. The competitiveness of taxi services using these vehicles is also considered in light of passenger perceptions of safety in an age of heightened awareness of road safety.
It's definitely a concern. Any commercial vehicle should have safety as its number one priority. Not stocking advanced safety features on the Tour H2 is a big miss from Maruti and could be a liability by fleet operators.
I disagree. All legal safety requirements are met by the Tour H2. Nice as these advanced features are, they come with a price. This means that smaller operators can afford newer, inherently safer vehicles than the older ones that they might otherwise use.
As a fleet manager, I'm torn. Lower price is attractive, but I am concerned about accidents costs and the reputation hit we may suffer if our passengers perceive our vehicles as unsafe.
Most taxi rides occur in slow, urban traffic, and you're all forgetting that. For this environment, the basic safety features are sufficient. Highway driving is more critical to advanced systems.
Maruti miss the opportunity, I believe. Instead, they could have brought in a safer Tour H2 as a premium option allowing operators to differentiate themselves on safety.
Now let’s look at the drivers as well. These vehicles are spent hours in every day. Shouldn't they be protected with modern safety features in their workplace?
I actually check the safety features of the taxis I ride in as a passenger. Even if they’re cheaper, I’d be less likely to pick a service that uses vehicles without modern safety tech.
Comment
Discussions and Questions
Does the Kia Sonet's 1.0L turbo-petrol engine live up to all the hype on the road?
03 January 2025 12:35
How have Kia Sonet owners found the long term reliability of the car?
03 January 2025 12:35
Does the Kia Sonet’s backseat really suck as much as people make it out to be?
03 January 2025 12:35
Is the Kia Sonet worth the premium it commands?
03 January 2025 12:35
The question is how does the Kia Sonet's build quality stack up against its rivals?
03 January 2025 12:35
View All Discussions
Ask a Question