Many adventure bike enthusiasts need long-distance touring capability. The more budget-friendly KTM 390 Adventure X uses the same engine and basic chassis as the more expensive sibling. But it’s missing some comfort features like the TFT display and comes with different tires. But riders often debate how these changes impact the bike’s touring ability compared to rivals such as the Royal Enfield Himalayan or the BMW G 310 GS. Fuel efficiency, comfort (especially over longer rides), luggage carrying capacity, and overall reliability are among the factors a bike needs to display to be considered a touring bike. In this question I want to find out how the 390 Adventure X fares in real-world touring.