How does the build quality of the Keeway K300 SF fair when compared to the more established brands?
In the domestic two wheeler market, Keeway is a new entrant. So in general people are skeptical about the build quality of a comparatively lesser known brand in comparison to established players. There are some riders that are concerned with long term reliability, parts availability and overall fit and finish. But some say that, in reality, there is a much smaller quality gap, since most of the components are sourced from the same suppliers as bigger brands. The discussion is also there about whether any corners were cut in order to achieve the competitive price point or whether Keeway is attempting to make a name for itself with higher standards. Key points of debate are paint quality, switchgear feel and how well the bike holds up over time, and owners' experiences with them.
The build quality was a pleasantly surprise. It's not Honda level, but for the price it’s definitely better than I expected.
Fit and finish are fine but panel gaps are not consistent and a few plastic bits feel cheap. You get what you pay for.
Mine has 10,000 km on it and no problems. So far everything has held up well and the engine feels solid. Long term reliability will tell time for.
The switchgear and controls are a bit flimsy compared to my friend’s Yamaha. It’s not a deal breaker, but it’s something you notice if you’re coming from Japanese bikes.
I believe that people are too hard on newer brands. Now, the quality gap isn't so big. It seems that Keeway is trying to build a good reputation.
Mine’s actually really good on paint quality. After a year of ownership, no chips or fading. In that area, they didn’t cut corners.
It's a mixed bag. Some parts feel premium, others feel cheap. Personally I’d say it’s on par with other bikes in that price range.
Comment
Discussions and Questions How Does The Build Quality Of The Keeway K300 Sf Fair When Compared To The More Established Brands
Ask a Question