Does the single channel ABS on the base variant compromise safety?
On the base variant of the Royal Enfield Classic 350 S Redditch Edition single channel ABS is offered, while dual channel ABS is available on higher trims. That has caused a debate among riders over the safety implications of opting for the base model. However, they say that single channel ABS, which works only on the front wheel, is sufficient for most of riding conditions and keeps the cost down. However, some argue it is not necessary, and use of dual channel ABS (that operates on both tyres) is vital for the maximum safety, particularly in the emergency braking situation or on slippery roads. Many potential buyers are conflicted between cost savings and possibly extra safety features. Is the single channel ABS really enough, or should safety conscious riders always go for dual channel?
If you have single channel ABS it’s better than having no ABS at all. Most of the time it will still save your bacon.
Dual-channel all the way. Why would you compromise on safety to save a few bucks?
It’s not perfect, but if you are an experienced rider, single channel ABS is something you can handle. Dual is definitely something newbies should go for.
I've ridden both, and I couldn't tell you the difference in your day to day riding. Most people can use single channel.
There is a bit of a let down that Royal Enfield does not offer dual Channel ABS across all variants. Safety shouldn’t be a premium feature.
City riding is fine on single channel, but for longer rides or if you ride in the hills, dual channel is worth the additional cost.
It is still a safer bike than many other bikes on the road even in base, single channel ABS variant. It's a good middle ground.
Comment
Discussions and Questions Does The Single Channel Abs On The Base Variant Compromise Safety
Does the single channel ABS on the base variant compromise safety?
09 January 2025 09:52
Ask a Question