logo
Fuel Bike Vs Electric Bike - Comprehensive Comparison

Fuel Bike Vs Electric Bike - Comprehensive Comparison

?There are several factors to take a look at when deciding whether to buy an electric or fuel bike. Because each type of vehicle has specific benefits and drawbacks, research is necessary. Let's look more closely at the main distinctions between these two types of bikes.

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT 

The environmental impact of petrol and electric bikes is one of the most obvious differences between them. Fuel bikes, which are frequently powered by petrol, release carbon dioxide (CO2) into the atmosphere when the fuel is burned. Climate change and poor air quality are both caused by carbon dioxide, which is a substantial contributor to environmental pollution on a worldwide scale. So, it causes pollution.

On the other hand, electric bikes use stored energy from rechargeable battery packs to power their motors. Electric bikes don't emit any carbon because there is no internal combustion engine. As a result, electric bikes are seen as being more ecologically friendly, in line with a growing focus on sustainable and responsible ways of mobility.

COST CONSIDERATIONS

Cost is an important factor to consider when choosing between fuel and electric motorbikes. Fuel motorbikes are well-established, and their technology has largely stabilized over the past few decades, resulting in more competitive price points. This affordability is particularly appealing to individuals on a tight budget, making fuel motorbikes a default choice for many.

In contrast, most modern electric scooters are dependent on lithium-ion batteries, which can contribute to the overall expense of an electric bike. When comparing the upfront cost of electric motorbikes with their gasoline-powered counterparts, electric bikes tend to be slightly more expensive. However, it is important to note that electric motorbikes often qualify for government subsidies, a financial incentive that petrol bikes do not enjoy. These subsidies can substantially offset the initial cost, with incentives in some regions amounting to as much as INR 15,000 per kilowatt-hour (KWh) for electric motorbikes.

FUEL EXPENSES AND EFFICIENCY

The financial aspect extends to fuel expenses and efficiency. Fuel bikes offer varying fuel efficiency levels depending on the engine's capacity. These bikes can return anywhere from 40 to 100 kilometers per liter of gasoline. As expected, higher-capacity engines generally have higher running costs.

On the other hand, electric bikes do not depend on petrol or diesel to run. Instead, they draw power from electricity to move the vehicle. Estimates suggest that operating an electric bike delivers a similar mileage at only 15% of the cost incurred by a petrol bike. This substantial cost savings over time can make electric bikes an economically beneficial choice.

RANGE CONSIDERATIONS

The range of a bike significantly influences its practicality, especially for daily usage and long-distance journeys. Presently, electric bikes face a minor challenge in this aspect. Most electric bikes, when fully charged, offer a maximum range of approximately 120 to 150 kilometers. While this range is good for traveling in cities and short trips well, it could be challenging for long journeys. As the charging infrastructure continues to expand and improve, electric bikes would be suitable for longer trips. 

However, it is necessary to keep in mind that recharging an electric bike takes longer than refilling a fuel bike, which might be an important consideration when planning trips. Fuel bikes do not encounter range-related concerns, due to the widespread availability of petrol stations, allowing riders to refuel and continue their journey without prolonged stops.

MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS

The ongoing maintenance demands of a bike can significantly affect the overall cost of ownership and the riding experience. Fuel bikes, due to their complicated mechanical components, regular servicing, and maintenance require high maintenance. Typical service intervals for these bikes range from 3 to 6 months. Neglecting maintenance can lead to reduced performance and potential breakdowns, causing inconvenience and safety concerns. 

Electric motorbikes, in contrast, are provided with far fewer mechanical parts, resulting in significantly reduced maintenance requirements. Regular maintenance primarily involves charging the battery and routine cleaning, simplifying ownership and potentially lowering long-term costs.

CONVENIENCE AND CHARGING

The convenience of refueling or recharging is an important aspect of owning and operating a bike. Fuel bikes generally offer more immediate convenience in this option. When a fuel bike runs out of fuel, a visit to the nearest petrol station allows for a quick refueling process, taking just a few minutes to complete as petrol pumps are present everywhere nowadays.

Conversely, electric bikes require charging, a process that can vary in duration depending on the charger type and battery capacity. A full charge may take anywhere from one to a couple of hours, making it a more time-consuming task than refueling a petrol bike. However, an increasing number of quick charging stations enable electric motorbike owners to charge up to 80% of the battery capacity in a relatively short time frame, typically 30 to 45 minutes.

 

Fuel Bike Vs Electric Bike - Comprehensive Comparison - picture
Fuel Bike Vs Electric Bike

 

EXAMPLES OF ELECTRIC BIKES

REVOLT RV400

The Revolt RV400 is a great advancement in the electric bike industry. Despite not clearly disclosing its maximum power output, this engine makes the most of it with an amazing 50 Nm of torque, promising thrilling rides. Your urban journeys are made simpler with this bike's single-speed gearbox. It is a suitable option for riders of different abilities and for traveling rough city roads due to the comfortable 814 mm seat height and ample 215 mm ground clearance. It is lightweight, contributing to its quick management, weighing only 108 kg. In the field of electric two-wheelers, the Revolt RV400 offers an exciting balance of power and environmental friendliness.

 

Fuel Bike Vs Electric Bike - Comprehensive Comparison - front
REVOLT RV400

 

ATHER 450X

In the field of urban mobility, the Ather 450X electric scooter is a unique and cutting-edge e-bike. It provides powerful and efficient performance for urban travel with a remarkable maximum power output of 8.58 HP and a torque of 26 Nm. With an automated gearbox, drivers can experience smooth acceleration without having to manually change ratios. For a variety of people, the supportive seat, which is positioned at a height of 780 mm, ensures a relaxed riding posture. It easily negotiates city terrain, including speed bumps and bumpy roads, just because of its 170 mm of ground clearance

 

Fuel Bike Vs Electric Bike - Comprehensive Comparison - front
ATHER 450X

 

EXAMPLES OF FUEL BIKES

HONDA CB SHINE 

The Honda CB Shine runs on a 124.73 cc engine, packing around 10.16 HP of power at 7500 rpm and 10.30 Nm of torque at 5500 rpm. It has a 5-speed gearbox for smoother rides. The seat is set at a comfy 800 mm height, and there is a good 160 mm of space beneath the bike for navigating all sorts of roads. It weighs about 123 kg, striking a nice balance between maneuverability and stability and it has a 10.5-liter fuel tank which means you can go on longer rides without constantly stopping for charging.

 

Fuel Bike Vs Electric Bike - Comprehensive Comparison - shot
HONDA CB SHINE 

 

YAMAHA SALUTO RX

The Yamaha Saluto RX is a 110 cc fuel-powered bike with a simple and efficient design. Its 110 cc air-cooled engine delivers about 7.4 bhp of power at 7,000 rpm, with 8.5 Nm of torque at 4,500 rpm. It uses a 4-speed gearbox to deliver power smoothly. One of its strong points is its excellent fuel efficiency, providing around 82 kilometers per liter. Yamaha's Blue Core technology enhances fuel efficiency and reduces emissions. It weighs approximately 98 kg and comes equipped with drum brakes for reliable stopping power. 

 

Fuel Bike Vs Electric Bike - Comprehensive Comparison - snapshot
YAMAHA SALUTO RX

 

PROS AND CONS OF ELECTRIC BIKES

PROS

Environmentally Friendly: Electric bikes produce zero emissions, making them an eco-friendly transportation option. They help in reducing air pollution and contribute to a cleaner environment.
Cost-Effective: Riding an electric bike is much cheaper than driving a car or using public transportation. The cost of electricity is significantly lower than fuels and maintenance expenses are generally minimal.
Health Benefits: Electric bikes offer the benefit of pedal-assistance, allowing riders to get exercise while cycling. You can choose how much effort you want to put into pedaling, making them accessible to a wide range of fitness levels.
Convenience: Electric bikes are a practical mode of transportation for daily traveling and running. They can help you avoid traffic jams and parking problems, and they often have features like cargo racks for carrying groceries or other items.
Extended Range: Electric bikes provide assistance, which extends the range of your trips. This is especially helpful for longer roads or hilly terrain, as the motor helps you maintain a comfortable ride.
No License Required: In many places, you don't need a special license to ride an electric bike. They're subject to fewer regulations than motorized scooters or bikes.
Silent Operation: Electric bikes are quieter than their gasoline-powered counterparts, reducing noise pollution in urban areas.

CONS 

Upfront Cost: Electric bikes can be more expensive to purchase initially compared to traditional bikes. High-quality e-bikes with advanced features and longer battery life can be particularly costly.
Limited Range: While the range of electric bikes has been improving, they still have limited battery life, which can affect long-distance travel. You may need to plan for recharging stops on extended trips.
Charging Time: Charging an electric bike takes time, typically a few hours. Quick charging stations are becoming more available, but they are not as widespread as petrol pumps.
Weight: Electric bikes are heavier than regular bicycles due to the added weight of the motor and battery. This can make them more challenging to transport or carry manually, especially when not using electric assistance.
Regulations and Laws: E-bike regulations can vary from area to area, including rules about speed limits, where you can ride, and licensing requirements. It is important to be aware of the laws in your area.

 

PROS AND CONS OF FUEL BIKES

PROS

Speed and Power: Fuel bikes are particularly motorcycles with high-capacity engines, offer impressive speed and power, making them ideal for those seeking adventurous rides.
Long Range: Fuel bikes can have a longer range compared to many electric bikes, which makes them suitable for long-distance journeys without frequent refueling.
Quick Refueling: Filling up the gas tank of a fuel bike is a fast and straightforward process, taking just a few minutes at a gas station.
Classic Aesthetics: Many riders appreciate the classic and timeless design of fuel bikes, including the rumbling engine sound and manual transmission, which provides a sense of control.
No Charging Required: Unlike electric bikes, fuel bikes don't need to be charged, providing the freedom to ride without worrying about battery life.

CONS

Environmental Impact: Fuel bikes produce emissions, including carbon dioxide, which contribute to air pollution and climate change. They are less eco-friendly than electric bikes.
Operational Costs: Gasoline can be expensive, and fuel bikes may require more frequent maintenance and servicing, which can add to the overall cost of ownership.
Noise and Vibration: The noise and vibration from fuel bike engines can be bothersome to some riders and may contribute to noise pollution in urban areas.
Limited Fuel Efficiency: Fuel bikes can vary in terms of fuel efficiency, with high-capacity engines often having lower miles per gallon (MPG), leading to higher fuel expenses.


In conclusion, your individual interests, preferences, and lifestyle will determine whether an electric or fuel-powered bike is preferable for you. Your decision-making process should take into account a number of factors, including the original cost, daily travel requirements, range requirements, operational costs, and maintenance considerations. Electric motorbikes are an excellent choice for short-distance commuting within cities because they are affordable, have minimal environmental impact, and are eligible for government subsidies while maybe requiring a higher initial outlay. No matter what choice you make, it's important to have thorough bike insurance coverage that gives you the go-ahead to ride your bike and provides financial protection in the event of accidents or damage, providing you peace of mind as you embark on your biking adventures.

 

-