When compared with Japanese competitors, how does the build quality of the Platina 110 fare over time?
The Bajaj Platina 110 is loved for the good value for money it offers, but then recently, there has been a lot of talk about the longevity of the motorcycle, with comparisons with Japanese brands, like Honda and Yamaha. Users who own Platina are mixed, though some claim the Platina holds up well long term use, while others complain of dirt and premature wear and tear on switches, paint, and chrome parts. The debate almost always involves if the savings the Platina has in the initial cost are negated by higher maintenance costs or shorter lifespan overall. Finally, Bajaj is pitted against the Japanese brands which have always faced questions related to after sales service quality — something which can make a lot of difference to an ownership experience and more so in such a premium offering. While some prefer the simplicity of the Platina's design, for less maintenance and cost, others enjoy the perceived Japanese engineering reliability, even if it does cost a little bit more up front.
5 years old and still smooth, my Platina has been running. It's just regular maintenance and it's all good. The build quality can’t be complained about.
Not Honda level, but decent. After a couple years of use the switches and plastics definitely feel cheaper.
I believe a lot depends on how you take care of it. If you take care of a Platina, it will last as long as any Japanese bike.
Solid engine and frame but little things like the stand spring or clutch cable seem to wear out more often than on my friend's Honda.
The Platina actually seems to hold up better in rusty conditions, in my experience. Fewer parts to be that fancy chrome and corrode.
It's a mixed bag. There are some parts that are surprisingly durable, and others that feel like they’re meant to be replaced. But for the money, it's not bad.
I've had both and the difference is not as big as people try to make it seem. After a few years, the Platina feels about 90 percent as good as a Honda, but for a fraction of the price.
There's definitely worse paint quality on the Japanese bikes. I had my Platina start to scratch and fade much earlier.
It's all about expectations. The build quality is very nice for the price. Of course, if you compare it to a bike that costs 30% more, it won't feel premium.
Comment
Discussions and Questions When Compared With Japanese Competitors How Does The Build Quality Of The Platina 110 Fare Over Time
No answers found .