What’s the difference between the Royal Enfield Himalayan and the XRE 300 Sahara?

Question

Two popular names in the affordable adventure bike segment are the Honda XRE 300 Sahara and the Royal Enfield Himalayan, but in different markets. Both the XRE 300 Sahara (sold in South America) and the Himalayan (global, including the US) have similar design philosophies: simple, rugged, and versatile motorcycles. Both bikes were designed for riders who want a capable machine for on-road and off-road adventures without emptying the bank account. But these vehicles vary in engine configuration, power output, as well as overall design aesthetics. As adventure riding enthusiasts search for mid-sized bikes to explore different terrains, the comparison of these two models has been of interest among many. Now, let’s have a look at how these two bikes fare off against each other.

Love · Accepted Answer

It’s more refined and reliable. Honda's engineering is another level; however, Royal Enfield has improved. In the longer term, the XRE will probably require less maintenance.

Gazal · Answer

But I would go for the character of the Himalayan. And it has that classic thumper feel and looks like a proper adventure bike. I don’t find the XRE too similar to a standard street bike.

Sucheta · Answer

I’ve ridden both, and I’d say the XRE 300 Sahara is better for on-road and daily use, while the Himalayan will be better in serious off-road situations. Witha lower seat height and a more laidback riding position, the Himalayan’s not as tricky to handle in tricky terrain.

Akshat · Answer

On paper, the XRE 300 Sahara wins with a better power-to-weight ratio and fuel efficiency. Specs don’t tell the whole story, though, and the Himalayan has a certain charm that the Honda does not.

Harish · Answer

If I were going on a long tour, I'd rather go with the Himalayan. It's more comfortable for miles eaten up because it has a larger fuel tank combined with a more upright riding position. One thing that the XRE feels more like is a true dual sport than a true adventure tourer.

Piyush · Answer

If you do a lot of city riding and the odd weekend adventure, the XRE 300 Sahara is the better option. You get a more responsive engine for urban environments, and it's more nimble in traffic.

Anju · Answer

The XRE probably handles better at higher speeds, but I love my Himalayan. Reviews say the XRE is more stable, but the Himalayan can feel a bit wobbly on the highway.

Krishna · Answer

Both are excellent bikes, but the Himalayan is the best bike to buy in the US because there are tons of parts and service available for them. If Honda doesn’t bring it in officially, good luck finding someone to work on an XRE.

Kuldeep · Answer

The XRE 300 Sahara looks like it would work better for shorter riders. Some people may find the Himalayan’s seat height a bit difficult, especially when fully loaded.

Priyanka · Answer

The Himalayan has a more passionate following, I think. Its simplicity and ruggedness are just something that you just connect with. While the XRE is likely a great bike, it just doesn’t seem to excite me in the same way.

Most Popular Cars

Recently Added Cars

Upcoming Cars

Discussions and Questions Whats The Difference Between The Royal Enfield Himalayan And The Xre 300 Sahara

Latest News

Recently Added News