Was taking the front brake off the Chetak 4-stroke a step backwards for safety?
Just like many scooters of its era, the original Bajaj Chetak had both front and rear brakes. But when Bajaj introduced the 4 stroke version, they decided to be controversial and took the front brake off some of the models. Apparently, this design choice was made because it was thought that front brakes could be dangerous if used incorrectly and could flip the scooter forward. The removal of the front brake generated a discussion about safety, rider control and the balance between traditional design and modern safety standards. A few riders said the scooter's lack of a front brake meant it lacked stopping power and safety, while others said that the rear brake was sufficient for the scooter's use in an urban environment.
Removing the front brake was nuts! That’s like selling a car with only rear brakes. Safety first, people!
I rode one with no front brake, and to be honest it wasn't that bad. The rear brake was strong enough for city use.
Both brakes are definitely safer. Rather, Bajaj should have spent the time educating riders and not simply removing a crucial safety feature.
Back then it was fine, no front brake, but today it wouldn't fly. That's a good thing, we've become more safety conscious.
I think the safety feature was a cost cutting measure. More safety is what you get with more brakes, period.
I never felt unsafe when I learned on a Chetak without a front brake. It’s knowing what your vehicle can handle.
Without a front brake, the scooter was lighter and more fuel efficient. There's always a trade-off.
Comment
Discussions and Questions Was Taking The Front Brake Off The Chetak 4 Stroke A Step Backwards For Safety
No answers found .