Is the Zen Estilo's boxy design a hit or miss?
The Maruti Zen Estilo, launched in 2006 as a successor to the iconic Zen, brought a significant design shift with its tall-boy, boxy styling. This was a departure from the sleek, sporty look of the original Zen that many had grown to love. The new design aimed to provide more interior space and practicality, but it also sparked debates among car enthusiasts. Some appreciated the increased headroom and ease of ingress/egress, while others felt it lacked the charm of its predecessor. The boxy shape was seen as either modern and practical or uninspired and generic, depending on who you asked. This design choice has remained a topic of discussion among Indian car enthusiasts, with opinions often divided on whether Maruti made the right call with this dramatic styling change.
I actually like the boxy design. It's practical and gives great headroom. Plus, it stands out from other small cars on the road.
No way, the original Zen looked way sportier. This feels like Maruti tried to make a mini-van and failed.
It's not pretty, but it's functional. I can fit so much more stuff in it compared to other hatchbacks.
The design grew on me over time. At first I hated it, but now I appreciate how easy it is to get in and out of.
It's a miss for me. The tall-boy design makes it look top-heavy and unstable, even if it isn't in reality.
I think it was ahead of its time. Now we see lots of boxy small cars, but the Estilo was one of the first.
The boxy shape makes it super easy to park in tight spots. Function over form, in my opinion.
Comment
Discussions and Questions Is The Zen Estilos Boxy Design A Hit Or Miss
No answers found .