Is the Ranger Raptor's reduced payload capacity enough to eliminate its practicality as a truck?
As with the Ranger Raptor’s performance oriented suspension and off road focus, this comes at a cost to payload capacity compared to standard Ranger models. The debate's erupted over the Raptor's usefulness as a work truck or when hauling lots of heavy loads. The Raptor is an off road beast that is very comfortable, but it's argued that the compromise on payload hinders its versatility. Much of the discussion centers on whether the Raptor is more a lifestyle vehicle than a traditional pickup truck. It’s up to potential buyers to decide if its off road capabilities are worth the potential limitations on everyday hauling and towing tasks.
The reduced payload isn’t an issue for most Raptor buyers. It’s less about utility and more about the experience.
It's definitely a limitation. But I love the Raptor, so it’s a deal breaker for me.
If you’re just carrying camping gear or dirt bikes, the payload is fine. Most people use it for that anyway.
It's a truck, but with different priorities. If you want max payload, get a regular Ranger.
However, improved ride quality is worth it when you consider the reduced payload. It just makes it so much better when you’re driving on a daily basis.
I wish Ford would provide a way to increase the payload for those that need it. Maybe a beefier rear spring option?
It's a compromise, but a compromise that makes sense for the target market. Not everyone is hauling bricks in their Raptor.
Comment
Discussions and Questions Is The Ranger Raptors Reduced Payload Capacity Enough To Eliminate Its Practicality As A Truck
No answers found .