Is the Bullet 350's single seat really impractical for most riders?
The classic styling of the Royal Enfield Bullet 350, including the ability to run with a single seat as an homage to its vintage past, are what the bike is known for. The design choice barks up the bike’s iconic look but comes at practicality’s expense. Having a single seat means that many riders will enjoy the ability to carry a passenger or extra luggage. As a result, many have argued that it’s just a matter of time before the aesthetic appeal finally eclipses the functional limitations of the standard seat, and Royal Enfield should simply make better, more versatile seating options standard. It’s also a discussion that often includes comparisons to other models in the RE lineup and other bikes that provide more passenger friendly designs.
I don’t love the single seat look but it’s not practical for my lifestyle. Because I ride with my girlfriend or need to carry stuff, I had to add a pillion seat. Function over form, I guess, kinda ruins the classic vibe, though.
What makes the Bullet a Bullet is the single seat. If you want practicality, buy a Splendor. That’s the whole point of owning a Bullet, after all, to be that classic, solo rider. It's not supposed to be a family hauler.
RE did a good job of balancing both options, I think. Easily add a pillion seat if needed, but you can get the classic single seat look. Best of both worlds, really. I wish the stock pillion seat was more comfortable, though.
Being a lone rider, the single seat is ideal. I got more space to move around and it looks badass. It’s also a great excuse when someone asks me for a ride and I don’t want to give one!
It might not be too practical, given the single seat, but that's half of the appeal. The Bullet was originally all about solo riding, and it forces you to embrace the solo riding experience. Other bikes for two up riding are available.
Comment
Discussions and Questions Is The Bullet 350S Single Seat Really Impractical For Most Riders
No answers found .