How does the NS160 fare as a long-term ownership proposition?
When considering a motorcycle purchase, long-term ownership experience is a crucial factor. The Bajaj Pulsar NS160, being a relatively newer model in the Pulsar lineup, has generated discussions about its reliability, maintenance costs, and overall ownership satisfaction over extended periods. Riders debate about the bike's build quality, the frequency of issues that crop up over time, and the ease of finding spare parts. There's also conversation around how well the bike ages, both in terms of performance and aesthetics. Some owners report excellent experiences with minimal issues, while others have faced recurring problems. The cost of ownership, including service costs and fuel efficiency in real-world conditions over time, is another point of discussion. Additionally, there's debate about how well the NS160 holds its value in the resale market compared to other bikes in its segment.
I've had mine for 3 years now, and it's been rock solid. Regular maintenance is key, but it hasn't given me any major headaches.
The first year was great, but after that, small issues started cropping up. Nothing major, but more frequent than I'd like.
Long-term, it's been good value for money. Fuel efficiency is still great, and parts are easily available.
I've found the maintenance costs a bit higher than expected. The oil-cooled engine seems to need more attention.
It ages well aesthetically, but performance-wise, you start feeling the need for more power after a couple of years.
As a daily commuter, it's held up brilliantly. No major issues in 4 years, and it still feels fresh to ride.
The resale value is decent, but not as good as some Japanese bikes. Something to consider if you plan to upgrade in a few years.
Long-term comfort is surprisingly good. Even after owning it for years, long rides aren't a pain.
Comment
Discussions and Questions How Does The Ns160 Fare As A Long Term Ownership Proposition
No answers found .