How do the KTM 690 SMC-R and Husqvarna 701 Supermoto stack up in real-world riding?
In fact, the KTM 690 SMC-R and Husqvarna 701 Supermoto are often spoken of in the same breath, as they share the same engines and the same basic design. Their powerful single-cylinder engines and lightweight chassis have made both bikes popular in the supermoto category. But riders often argue about the subtle differences between these two machines. Do you notice much handling changes, power delivery, or even differences when riding? Depending on who you ask, some say the differences are cosmetic, and others swear by one brand over the other. So, let’s take a dive into the real-world experiences of riders who have spent time on both bikes and see if there’s a clear winner or if it’s simply down to personal preference.
I’ve ridden both, and the differences are really slight. The 701 is a bit more refined, but the 690 feels a bit rawer, a little more KTM. Ultimately, it’s just a matter of which brand you like.
The riding position of the 690 SMC R is slightly more aggressive, which I like for carving corners. Longer rides are a bit more upright and comfortable on the 701. They're both virtually identical performance-wise.
Both as an owner of both (at different times), I would say the 701 has a smoother power delivery; the 690 feels a bit more punchy. If that’s important to you, the KTM also has a slightly better stock exhaust note.
Basically, they're the same bike with different plastics. If someone tells you there’s a huge difference, they’re probably just trying to justify their purchase. They’re both awesome; just choose which one you think looks cooler.
I think the 701 has better stock suspension. It was more compliant over rough roads. Having said that, most people will likely still upgrade the suspension on either bike.
The ergonomics of the 690 SMC-R are what I like. They just fit me better on the seat and tank shape. It's a personal thing, though: try sitting on both if you can before making a decision.
At high speeds, the 701 feels a little bit more stable, whereas the 690 seemed a little bit more flickable in tight turns. While the differences are subtle, if you ride them back to back, you’ll notice.
I’ve found the KTM to be a little bit easier to work on maintenance-wise. The Husky does have some quirks that make simple things an annoyance. It’s not a deal breaker, but if you wrench yourself, it’s worth considering.
The 690 seems to have more aftermarket support, especially for performance parts, I’ve noticed. If you are going to mod your bike, that might be something to consider.
I mean, it’s honestly whichever one you can find a better deal on. Unless you're a pro racer, you won't notice the minor differences in day-to-day riding, which are so similar between them.
Comment
Discussions and Questions How Do The Ktm 690 Smc R And Husqvarna 701 Supermoto Stack Up In Real World Riding
No answers found .