Has the Tour H1's stripped down design made it more reliable and easier to maintain than the regular Alto?
With a more basic design, the Maruti Tour H1, a commercial variant of the popular Alto, has a little less to offer than its consumer counterpart. This simplifies things by removing some comfort feature and using more robust materials in some places. Backers say this stripped down approach yields a vehicle that is more durable and easier to maintain, especially when the conditions are as harsh as those that commercial vehicles often experience. Fewer electronic components mean fewer things to go wrong, they say, and simpler mechanics mean it is quicker and cheaper to fix. However, on the flip side critics say the cost cutting measures could actually create a car that is less reliable, with lower quality materials could mean the car breaks down more often. There's also debate about how much the simplified design actually simplifies maintenance, or if it's just a question of moving the types of problems mechanics have to deal with. Now, let's examine what the Tour H1’s design choices mean for its long term reliability and maintenance costs as compared to the standard Alto.
Having worked on Altos and Tour H1s, I can assure you that the Tour H1 is definitely easier to work on. Less electronic gizmo equals less headache when something goes wrong. Also, the more robust materials in high wear areas really do make a difference in the long haul.
Easier to maintain? Maybe. More reliable? I'm not so sure. I saw enough Tour H1s that had problems you wouldn’t expect to see in a regular Alto. In some areas, I think the cost cutting goes a bit too far, particularly with the suspension components.
Both of you are missing the bigger picture. The real advantage of the Tour H1's design is that it's something your average roadside mechanic can fix. You can keep these things running in a pinch with some creative jugaad that wouldn’t fly with a more complex vehicle.
I believe we are over thinking this. The Alto is basically Tour H1 without all the things to break. Less components usually equals more reliability, it’s not rocket science. Of course some parts will be cheaper, but the fact that it's all so simple is a big plus in my book.
As a fleet operator, I can say that while the Tour H1’s simplicity does mean lower maintenance costs overall. However, it's not just a question of design, but also the use of the vehicle. Commercial vehicles take a beating and anything we can do to reduce the complexity is a win in my book.
You guys are forgetting the psychological factor. Commercial vehicles are treated rougher by drivers than personal cars. And even though the Tour H1 is more durable, it might not matter if drivers don’t take care of it.
I do not believe the Tour H1's reliability will be tested in the first few years, but rather in 5 or 10 years, when these cars are all used up. We’ll see if the stripped down design really pays off in the long term.
Comment
Discussions and Questions Has The Tour H1s Stripped Down Design Made It More Reliable And Easier To Maintain Than The Regular Alto
No answers found .