Has Royal Enfield lost the Himalayan 450’s reliability and simplicity for performance?
The Himalayan 450 has changed the game for Royal Enfield in their adventure touring lineup. The original Himalayan 411 was praised for its simplicity, ease of maintenance and rugged reliability, but the 450 model brings in more complex systems, such as liquid cooling, ride by wire throttle and advanced electronics. However, those debates among enthusiasts regarding whether or not Royal Enfield has strayed from the principles that originally attracted adventure riders to the original Himalayan, especially those exploring remote areas, should spark interest in this redesign. The reliability of these more sophisticated components in the long term, and in harsh conditions, has raised concerns, as well as whether their increased performance is worth potentially more complicated and costly maintenance. However, some are also concerned that the extra complexity will make roadside repairs more difficult, which could compromise the bike's suitability for long distance adventure riding in places where there won't be specialized service centers nearby.
I think RE has definitely paid some performance for simplicity on the 450. Liquid cooling and electronics are great for power and efficiency, but they’re also more points of failure. I’m concerned about how it will stand up on long, remote trips where you’re not going to be able to just pop into a dealer and have it fixed.
It’s true the 450 is more complex, but I don’t think RE has sacrificed reliability. If you keep these bikes maintained, they’re pretty bulletproof. But it’s a better all rounder, plus the improved performance and comfort. It's still a lot easier than most adventure bikes in its class.
I've done long trips on both the 411 and 450 and I actually like the new bike better. It's got more tech, but it's also much more capable and comfortable for long distances. The concerns over reliability are overblown, these systems have been proven on other bikes. It's fine as long as you do your maintenance.
I'm torn on this one. The 411 is definitely simpler but the 450 is definitely a better performer. It was nice to know that I could fix most things with basic tools. I’m not sure that’s a good thing for long term reliability, but the 450 feels like it’s trying to compete with bikes way out of its price range.
I think people romanticize the 411 far too quickly as being simple. Early models too had their share of issues. The modern design of the 450 could actually make it more reliable over the long haul. And because its performance is better, you aren’t thrashing the engine as hard to maintain highway speeds or climb hills.
Comment
Discussions and Questions Has Royal Enfield Lost The Himalayan 450S Reliability And Simplicity For Performance
No answers found .