Did the AVL lean burn engine in the Machismo 350 really solve Royal Enfield's reliability problems?
One of the first models to adopt the AVL lean burn engine was the Royal Enfield Machismo 350, the first departure from the decades old cast iron engine used in previous Bullets. The new engine was touted as being more efficient, cleaner and more reliable than the old one. It is a turning point for Royal Enfield, which began addressing some of the long standing reliability issues that plagued earlier models, and many Royal Enfield enthusiasts believe this. But people do seem divided on whether the AVL engine actually delivered on what it promised. Some riders say they got improved reliability and fewer breakdowns, while others say they still had typical Royal Enfield problems. The problem is what ultimately happened to this engine, whether it turned out to be a genuine improvement or just a marginal one that didn't fully solve the root problem.
It was a definite improvement, but 'solved' is a strong word. My old cast iron Bullet had fewer problems than my Machismo, but my Machismo still had a few.
Most Popular Cars
Based on Cars Popular on Maxabout
Toyota Yaris V Optional
₹ 12,39,000
1125 Views
Mahindra Bolero Neo Plus Ambulance
₹ 13,99,000
1405 Views
Tata Harrier Dark Edition XZAS AT
₹ 21,64,900
640 Views Recently Added Cars
New Cars Added On Maxabout
VinFast VF7 Sky Infinity
₹ 25,49,000
440 Views
VinFast VF7 Sky
₹ 24,99,000
421 Views
VinFast VF7 Wind Infinity
₹ 23,99,000
444 Views Upcoming Cars
Exciting Upcoming Cars
Maruti Swift Hybrid
₹ 10,00,000
1573 Views
Renault Boreal Bigster SUV
₹ 13,00,000
1638 Views
Leapmotor T03
₹ 8,00,000
1154 Views Discussions and Questions Did The Avl Lean Burn Engine In The Machismo 350 Really Solve Royal Enfields Reliability Problems
No answers found .
Latest News
Recently Added News
Triumph Street Triple RX vs Moto2: Key Differences Explained for 2025
Tuesday, 07 October 2025 6:14 AM
Citroen Aircross X 2025 Launch – Smarter, More Premium SUV at ₹8.29 Lakh
Monday, 06 October 2025 23:39 PM