Can the Bajaj Platina 100's build quality be justified by its budget friendly price or is it just ‘you get what you pay for’?
The Bajaj Platina 100 is famous for being affordable, and is often the cheapest 100cc motorcycle in the market. Although this low price point has led to debates of the overall build quality and longevity of this product. It’s value for money, according to some owners, but others moan about rusting, paint quality and flimsy plastic parts. It also discusses how it stands up over time compared to some slightly more expensive competition. Is the Platina 100 a smart budget choice that gives you more than your money’s worth, or are buyers giving up too much of the quality and durability they expect? Now, let’s look at owner experiences to see if the Platina’s build quality lives up to its budget friendly reputation.
At the price, the Platina is a steal. It’s not premium quality, but it does the job without cost a fortune.
You certainly do get what you pay for. After one monsoon season, my Platina started showing rust spots. The paint quality is terrible.
You can't expect Honda build quality at this price point. For a segment, the Platina is decently built.
The engine and core components look good, but Bajaj skimped on switches and plastics. They feel cheap and flimsy.
I’ve driven mine 50,000 km with no major issues. The way that you keep it is all that it is. It will last if you treat it well.
The build quality is inconsistent. Some are surprisingly good, others are obviously cheap. It's a mixed bag.
The Platina definitely feels less sturdy, coming from a Hero Splendor. It’s also significantly cheaper, so I can’t complain too much.
They were better built. Bajaj seems to be cutting more corners these days to keep the price low.
Comment
Discussions and Questions Can The Bajaj Platina 100S Build Quality Be Justified By Its Budget Friendly Price Or Is It Just You Get What You Pay For
No answers found .