Discussions and Questions Royal Enfield - Page 31
Was the Machismo 350 a half baked attempt at modernization or ahead of its time?
13 January 2025 06:40
I would call it a natural step in RE evolution. It wasn’t perfect, but it at least showed that they were willing to change or adapt. That's pretty forward thinking for RE at the time.
Was the Machismo 350 a half baked attempt at modernization or ahead of its time?
13 January 2025 06:40
I’m an old school Bullet fan and I think the Machismo went too far. Without gaining enough modern benefits, it lost some of the classic Bullet charm.
Was the Machismo 350 a half baked attempt at modernization or ahead of its time?
13 January 2025 06:40
But that's not saying much, as it was ahead of its time for Royal Enfield. The Machismo was playing catch up, they were so far behind other manufacturers.
Was the Machismo 350 a half baked attempt at modernization or ahead of its time?
13 January 2025 06:40
Royal Enfield’s Machismo was the awkward teenage years of Royal Enfield. More or less grown up, but really trying to be mature. Kinda endearing, really.
Was the Machismo 350 a half baked attempt at modernization or ahead of its time?
13 January 2025 06:40
I think RE made a smart move. But they knew they needed to modernize, they couldn't alienate their core fans. The Machismo was a good fit for its time.
As long-distance tourers, what sets the KTM 390 Adventure apart from the Royal Enfield Himalayan 450?
13 January 2025 06:40
Well, the KTM is definitely better for all this mixed touring with lots of twisty roads. Its engine is more powerful, and its handling is a sporty affair on pavement.
As long-distance tourers, what sets the KTM 390 Adventure apart from the Royal Enfield Himalayan 450?
13 January 2025 06:40
If looking for pure long-distance comfort, I'd go for the Himalayan. After hours in the saddle, the upright seating position and good wind protection are a big deal.
As long-distance tourers, what sets the KTM 390 Adventure apart from the Royal Enfield Himalayan 450?
13 January 2025 06:40
Better fuel efficiency of the 390 Adventure puts it on a higher edge for touring. Of course, on long trips, you can go further between fill-ups.
As long-distance tourers, what sets the KTM 390 Adventure apart from the Royal Enfield Himalayan 450?
13 January 2025 06:40
All the way Himalayan for touring. Low-end torque is great for loaded riding, and it's easier to work on if something goes wrong in the middle of nowhere.
As long-distance tourers, what sets the KTM 390 Adventure apart from the Royal Enfield Himalayan 450?
13 January 2025 06:40
I've set up camp on both, and honestly, after touring on them both, I have more confidence in the KTM's more advanced electronics (like traction control and cornering ABS), especially in bad weather.
As long-distance tourers, what sets the KTM 390 Adventure apart from the Royal Enfield Himalayan 450?
13 January 2025 06:40
Simplicity is the Himalayan 450's strength for touring. Easier to fix if it goes wrong, and less to go wrong. And that engine is butter smooth at highway speed.
As long-distance tourers, what sets the KTM 390 Adventure apart from the Royal Enfield Himalayan 450?
13 January 2025 06:40
Plus, KTM’s dealer network is better in many countries—something that could make a big difference in case you break down on a long tour and need parts and service.
As long-distance tourers, what sets the KTM 390 Adventure apart from the Royal Enfield Himalayan 450?
13 January 2025 06:40
The lighter weight of the 390 Adventure means it’s easier to handle for the fully loaded touring version when you’re on narrow mountain roads.
As long-distance tourers, what sets the KTM 390 Adventure apart from the Royal Enfield Himalayan 450?
13 January 2025 06:40
For touring, the Himalayan is the bike I prefer. The leisurely pace is a bit more enjoyable. It’s not always about getting there the fastest.
How does the Interceptor 350 fair against the Meteor 350 for daily commuting?
13 January 2025 06:36
The Interceptor is, hands-down, better for commuting. It is more nimble in traffic and you have better visibility with that upright position. It’s also just more fun to ride!
How does the Interceptor 350 fair against the Meteor 350 for daily commuting?
13 January 2025 06:36
For every day use I'd pick the Meteor. It helps keep your back and wrists more relaxed because it's easier to ride in a relaxed position when you wait at those long traffic lights. Plus it has a lower seat height, which is good for those that are shorter.
How does the Interceptor 350 fair against the Meteor 350 for daily commuting?
13 January 2025 06:36
Both of them are good options, but I like the Interceptor better. It’s great, nice and sporty and feels more responsive in city traffic so you can make a quick move when needed.
How does the Interceptor 350 fair against the Meteor 350 for daily commuting?
13 January 2025 06:36
The Meteor wins for me. There's more comfortable seat for longer rides and the engine is a bit smoother in stop and go traffic. It’s nice to have the extra wind protection of the small visor too.
How does the Interceptor 350 fair against the Meteor 350 for daily commuting?
13 January 2025 06:36
I have ridden both and the Interceptor is my choice for commuting. It just makes the ride more alive and engaging, which is more helpful in waking me up on those early morning rides to work!
How does the Interceptor 350 fair against the Meteor 350 for daily commuting?
13 January 2025 06:36
It’s really about your commute. If you have a lot of highway miles, the Meteor might be your best bet. The Interceptor's agility is the key for purely urban riding.
Ask a Question